User talk:Toxicavengergoteborg

Welcome!

Hello, Toxicavengergoteborg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Claviere (talk) 21:13, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Gothenburg
I have reverted your recent change to Gothenburg. While there is a legitimate debate to be had about which name should be used in the article, at present there appears to be a clear consensus on the articles talk page to use Gothenburg. Rather than ignoring this consensus, please engage in a debate on the talk page. If the consensus changes, then the article will be updated. Best, Claviere (talk) 21:13, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Well, I disagree with the analysis that that was the consenus. The consensus was actually that the name Göteborg should be used rather than the old Gothenbourg. Kindly revert your revertion. //toxicavenger — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.227.39.4 (talk • contribs)


 * The most recent discussion I can see on the talk page is for a request page move to Göteborg: Talk:Gothenburg. The resounding consensus there is to keep the page at Gothenburg. Have I missed a more recent discussion on the talk page that came to a different conclusion? Claviere (talk) 21:21, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

sadly no, i read the section "old talk" which did not really present any opposition to change tha name. i hadn't spotted the section about the move of page. i really did not want to move the page, only correct its spelling. there is also the section called "name" which does not pose a consensus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.227.39.4 (talk) 21:30, 24 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I agree that the debate at Talk:Gothenburg is not as clear cut as the later debate about moving the article. Both took place a number of years ago, so it might be worth asking the name question again on the Talk page. It may be that a consensus for a change will emerge now, five years after the last debate. If it does, then making the change to the article is easy. Until then, I think it isn't appropriate to just go ahead and change the name in the article. Best, Claviere (talk) 21:34, 24 August 2011 (UTC)