User talk:Toysoy

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --kingboyk 13:06, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Kim McGinn
Do not remove the deletion tag. ĢĿ€Ñ §τοĿĿ€ŖγŤč'' 12:14, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Warning level 3: Stop removing the deletion tag
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Kim McGinn, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stop removing the deletion tag, this is considered vandalism ĢĿ€Ñ §τοĿĿ€ŖγŤč'' 12:29, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Warning level 4: Last chance.
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ĢĿ€Ñ §τοĿĿ€ŖγŤč'' 12:37, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

3 Revert Rule Warning
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Kim McGinn. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. —This unsigned comment was added by Stollery (talk • contribs).

Welcome to Wikipedia! We could really use your help to create new content, but your recent additions do not assert the notability of their subjects and have been reverted or removed. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --kingboyk 13:05, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

No article is permanently deleted, it still resides in the database and is easily restored. Let me know on Talk:Kim McGinn why this person is notable enough to meet the guidelines in WP:BIO and that verifiable sources are available per WP:V. Please note that analysts are very rarely if ever notable enough for inclusion in an enyclopedia. --kingboyk 13:18, 2 April 2006 (UTC)