User talk:Tp 2k7

Portion on Bahai
Ahmadiyyat has nothing to do with Bahai, I feel that it will be misleading to compare the two. Bahai claims to be a totally independant religion from Islam (a new law) while Ahmadiyyat claims to be Islam in its purity.

Sirius86 (talk) 14:34, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Ahmadiyya Muslim Community
Hello There!!!!!!!

For your info, make sure to leave your views on Talk Page of the Article. Placing your views within article may create vandalism.

Happy editing

Hitrohit2001 (talk) 20:18, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Hitrohit2001

Ahmadiyya Muslim Community
If you want to discuss any proposal to the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community or you want to propose any relevant changes to the article then please leave the message on the discussion page of the article. The page has controversy tag which means that the changes to article without substantial citation may bring the article under dispute. So please discuss the changes you recommend there. I hope this will help.

Happy editing.

Hitrohit2001 (talk) 20:42, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Hitrohit2001

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:31, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

'International' Ahmadiyya
Hi, I have changed 'international Ahmadiyya Muslim Community' to Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, because there is no use for calling it 'international'. It goes without saying. It is obviously international in its scope and expans, but is NOT named as such. It is simply called Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, International is its description, not its title. The 'international satelite channel and the Community itself are two very different things.

Sirius86 (talk) 13:10, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Maitreya
I'm removing the material you have added until you can find a suitable citation. Wikipedia is not a source in itself. You need to find a reliable third-party publication to support your claims. Thank you. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 18:03, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of List of Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement Mosques
A tag has been placed on List of Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement Mosques requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. LAA Fan  02:51, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Mahmood Mosque (Kababir)
Please help to enhance the article Mahmood Mosque Kababir. I started a material collection about this topic (here), but may be you have more information sources. Greetings --Ahmadi (talk) 23:53, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Al-Sadiq Mosque
See also Al-Sadiq Mosque-Article. --Ahmadi (talk) 00:26, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for Image:LogoMuslimTelevisionAhmadiyya2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:LogoMuslimTelevisionAhmadiyya2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 15:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for Image:LogoMuslimTelevisionAhmadiyya.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:LogoMuslimTelevisionAhmadiyya.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 15:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Manifestation of God
Please refrain from adding the content to the Manifestation of God article. There are no reliable sources that state that Baha'is believe that the founder of the Ahmaddiyya community is viewed as a Manifestation of God or respected as such. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 03:10, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The article is about Manifestations of God in the Baha'i Faith, not about who Baha'is respect. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 03:14, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Did you even read those sections? Those sections refer to specific statements by Baha'i leaders stating that those people are not considered Manifestations of God (or prophets) in the Baha'i Faith.  There are no statements regarding the founder of the Ahmaddiyya community by Baha'u'llah, Abdu'l-Baha, or Shoghi Effendi (the only ones who could have made that statement).  Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 03:19, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * None of the articles you referred to state that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is respected by Baha'is. The first is a forum posting that is not considered a reliable sources, and does not state anything about Baha'i views on Mirza Ghulum Ahmad.  The second states "although there is evidence that Baha'is did make an attempt to raise their claims with the leader of the Ahmaddiya movement, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadiyan" which states nothing regarding being respected by the Baha'is.  I will be removing your content again.  Also note that you are on the verge of breaking the 3RR rule.  Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 03:27, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

And the other point that you are missing is that the article is about Baha'i views. The only people who can make authoritative statements in the Baha'i Faith for Baha'i belief were/are Baha'u'llah, Abdu'l-Baha, Shoghi Effendi and the Universal House of Justice. Note that all sources in the article refer back to statements made by those people/institutions. None of those people institutions/people have made any comment about Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 03:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Merge of Jesus in Ahmadiyya Islam
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahmadi~enwiki (talk • contribs) 01:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Abcdd.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Abcdd.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 01:36, 28 October 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 01:36, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Theelements.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Theelements.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 01:37, 28 October 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 01:37, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of AcidFlow
Hello Tp 2k7, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created on October 28 2010, AcidFlow, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:GrandKokla (page has mainspace links, and 33 edits). This has been done because the page seems to be about a person, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add " " to the page text, and edit the to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:GrandKokla. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of 06:38, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of AcidFlow


The article AcidFlow has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable rapper - no reliable sources to establish the subject's notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salih ( talk ) 05:49, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Theelements.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Theelements.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:10, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Notable People of Ahmadiyya Muslim Community


The article Notable People of Ahmadiyya Muslim Community has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. The Last Angry Man (talk) 01:46, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Split from Ahmadiyya
If you want to redo the split, please discuss it here before. Note that the list you created actually included less people with notability demonstrated and sourced (per WP:LISTPEOPLE). So what you were performing was reducing the number of notable people mentioned in a split, which I believe very few editors will agree is a constructive move. --Muhandes (talk) 10:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Misuse of categories and wikilinks
Greetings, you have been here nearly four years now, but given your editing at Jamia Ahmadiyya it is apparent that you are not familiar with how categories and wikilinks work in Wikipedia. Your article massively overused both of there:
 * Categories should be as narrrow as applicable, so an article about an Islamic school in India should not be directly placed into Category:India and Category:Islam, but rather into the most specific subcats thereof.
 * Wikilinks (blue clickable links) should only be used on the first iteration of a given term in an article, so the term Ahmadiyya should only be linked once throughout the article, vice every time it appears.

I strongly suggest you read the guides WP:Categories and WP:Wikilinks to gain a clear understanding of how these are best used to help, rather than complicate, your articles. MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:42, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

- Thank you for that User:Tp 2k7 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.235.24.84 (talk) 19:55, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Haqaiq al-furqan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Madina and Hafiz


 * Jamia Ahmadiyya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Spanish and Tarikh

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. When you recently edited Mirza Masroor Ahmad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Casey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:31, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Haqaiq al-furqan
This article gives the impression as Haqaiqul Furqan was written by Noor-ud-Din himself. This is incorrect. The 4-volume book is an exegesis compiled from Noor-ud-Din's sermons and discourses of The Holy Quran and was first published in the late 1990s. As such it has never been considered his magnum opus nor has it ever been considered a masterpiece of Quranic exegesis from the 1880s as it wasn't written or published at that time.

The English language is also very defective which I will correct in places. Nevertheless, the errors in the above paragraph ought to be corrected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.194.4.196 SEMTEX85 (talk) 15:46, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mirza Masroor Ahmad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Stevens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Edit to Antidepressants Article
Thanks for recently contributing to the article on antidepressants. I chose to remove your contribution because I felt that the findings that you cited were not significant enough to be considered encyclopedic. The study had no control group and such personality changes are not surprising. There are 10,000s of scientific articles on antidepressants and we simply can't cite all of them here. If you would like to discuss this edit further, you can respond on my talk page or on the article's talk page. I appreciate your efforts to contribute to contribute to Wikipedia and I hope you continue to do so. The article on antidepressants, for instance, needs a lot of work in order to make it more cohesive and organized. Higgyrun3 (talk) 06:32, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Can you keep it on for the next week please? I have to do it for an assignment for psychology class. I hope you understand lol. Tp 2k7 (talk) 06:32, 15 March 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.231.30.137 (talk)


 * Sorry, that's not how wikipedia works. What's the assignment for your psych class? Are you asked to contribute to wikipedia? If so I could point you to different contributions to make. In the future, remember to sign in and post to my talk page, per wikipedia policy. Higgyrun3 (talk) 14:09, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Ahmadiyya Project
 --Peace world  21:47, 26 December 2015 (UTC)