User talk:Tpuschmann

Nomination of InsureTech for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article InsureTech is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/InsureTech until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 01:51, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Insurance technology for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Insurance technology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Insurance technology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 02:32, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia policy discourages creating articles about things you personally came up with. If something is truly notable, someome else will create the article. I encourage you to get involved with productive editing here though. Legacypac (talk) 02:44, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Tpuschmann. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 12:32, 8 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello @MrOllie, thanks for your note. We were among the first ones who structured this term in an academic paper and we believe it provides great value, whereas the other cited sources are much younger. There is no commercial interest in this citation. Thank you. Tpuschmann (talk) 17:25, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia does not limit conflict of interest to commercial interests. Inserting your own work is also considered to be a form of conflict of interest here. MrOllie (talk) 17:33, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't it make sense that others, that might not know these sources, validate, if such sources should be added or not and not just simply decide this based on the fact that an author, who might be well accepted in a community, adds one of her/his sources? Tpuschmann (talk) 17:37, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia has process for such validation, which is explained in the message above and the links contained within it. MrOllie (talk) 17:54, 2 December 2022 (UTC)