User talk:Trackerwiki

October 2009
Your recent addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 21:58, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Ignore that message! False positive :-) Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 22:00, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Criticism of awarding of Nobel Peace Prize to Barack Obama
Please be aware of my comments on the talk page. Adambro (talk) 17:40, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 18:37, 9 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi tracker. I've noticed that some of the cites you added to the lede for the Nobel article don't actually back up the facts you're trying to source. I'm in the process of trying to associate these with the correct sources. Just wanted to let you know. Best, -- B figura (talk) 21:01, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Again, the cite you added doesn't exactly support the sentence you added to the Lede. We really can't put words in other people's mouths, especially not in a lede. If you're interested, Bojangles and I are trying to find an optimal wording on my talk -- B figura (talk) 21:20, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Again, the articles you've cited don't really back up the statement. Also, please note that I think you've hit WP:3RR. -- B figura (talk) 21:23, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * And if you'd like to join in, the relevant talk page discussion is here. -- B figura (talk) 21:26, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Undue weight, encyclopedia article vs. news article
Please do not reinsert your additions to Nobel Prize without addressing the concerns described in the revert edit summary.

A general remark: You seem to be very interested current partisan political discussions in the United States of America. Please note that this an encyclopedia which tries to give a long-time, international and neutral perspective on its subjects.

Regards, HaeB (talk) 21:36, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 21:37, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * by all means! --Trackerwiki (talk) 22:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Opposition to the Iraq War
I am asking you, politely, for a second time, not to make mass changes to Opposition to the Iraq War. The material you keep adding is disputed and therefore it is necessary to proceed slowly, so editors have the necessary time to examine the changes you wish to make. Just make a couple of edits per day, so we have time to discuss the issues separately. Dynablaster (talk) 13:39, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Why do you continue to make contentious, sweeping changes? They are not going to stick unless you proceed slowly, making just a few edits each day. Please don't ignore the concerns of multiple editors. Dynablaster (talk) 20:13, 24 October 2009 (UTC)


 * It's not my intention to confuse anyone, nor to cause unnecessary dispute. If the pace of updates is your main objection, I will retrace my contributions from the beginning and then add a very few articles at a time to better invite review of their relevance, materiality, accuracy, and writing.--Trackerwiki (talk) 20:19, 24 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I've proposed that the three of us discuss each of the additions and get a consensus on them before you add another batch. I hope slowing it down like this isn't too frustrating, but it seems the best way to avoid repeated reverts which don't do anyone any good. Olaf Davis (talk) 21:17, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 19:12, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Opposition to the Iraq War has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Jovianeye (talk) 17:54, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Edit warring in Opposition to the Iraq War
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Regards, HaeB (talk) 18:42, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

You win 1,000 internets
also i call poe's law

EvanHarper (talk) 06:13, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)