User talk:Tradedot

AfD nomination of Sourcingizer
An article that you have been involved in editing, Sourcingizer, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. Malcolmxl5 19:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Deletion review/Content review
If I have understood your note at Deletion review/Content review correctly, you wished to appeal the decision to delete the article Sourcingizer following its listing at Articles for deletion/Sourcingizer. There, the concept was found to be a neologism, which indicates that it could not be demonstrated through reliable, secondary sources that the term is notable and in widespread use. The appeal process is meant to address when a debate has been interpreted incorrectly by the closer or when some significant new information relevant to the debate has appeared. If you do wish to appeal the decision, you should review the process set forth at "steps to list a new deletion review". The section where you placed your note is for temporary restoration of material to userspace for review and is not the proper location to request such an appeal. Feel free to drop me a note at my talk page if I have not explained this well, and I'll be happy to expand on it. Please remember to sign your comments by placing four tildes ( ~ ) at the end. This will identify you so that I can more easily respond. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:14, 22 October 2007 (UTC)