User talk:Tradereddy

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! —Largo Plazo (talk) 04:05, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of "Modding Monthly"
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 04:05, 5 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, I asked to have this deleted because you went and recreated the same article, correctly titled, afterwards. —Largo Plazo (talk) 04:11, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Modding Monthly


The article Modding Monthly has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No reliable sources from Google, notability seems unlikely for this magazine.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 04:09, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 04:10, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Modding Monthly
I have nominated Modding Monthly, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Modding Monthly. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Largo Plazo (talk) 14:30, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

The Booth At The End
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Booth At The End, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.contentfilm.com/index.php/film_tv/all_film_tv/1219.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:28, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with "Shorts In The City"
Hello. Concerning your contribution, "Shorts In The City", please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.citytv.com/toronto/show/basic/76777--shorts-in-the-city. As a copyright violation, "Shorts In The City" appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. "Shorts In The City" has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:&quot;Shorts In The City&quot; and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:&quot;Shorts In The City&quot; with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:&quot;Shorts In The City&quot;.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 12:35, 14 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Please do not copy material into Wikipedia. Below every edit screen it says "Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted." Minor changes of wording are not sufficient - see WP:Copy-paste. Even if you own the copyright, it is essential to follow the steps explained in Donating copyrighted materials. In any case, Wikipedia is not a notice-board onto which to pin material written for another purpose: it is likely to have a promotional tone unsuitable for an encyclopedia article, which requires a neutral point of view. There is good advice on writing acceptable articles at Your first article. JohnCD (talk) 13:18, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Booth At The End


The article The Booth At The End has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; RHaworth 16:38, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Copyright violations
Your addition to Adam Adamowicz has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Canterbury Tail talk  01:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Final Warning
I have just deleted Echo Bazaar, which I see is far from the first article you've created that someone else has had to spend time removing. Stop, and carefully read the notability criteria and the reliable source guidelines. Do not add anything more to Wikipedia until you understand those rules. While we appreciate helpful contributions, people who make unhelpful contributions and cannot correct themselves are blocked from editing. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:34, 20 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Concerning Echo Bazaar, the fact that it won the Escapist Magazine's award for best browser game in 2009, and has been reviewed in The New Yorker, probably means that it is notable, but those references have to be properly added to the article. At the moment I don't have the time to write a proper article about the game, but will try to do so in the weekend - if I can find sufficient references. If the references can't be found, it doesn't matter how great the game is (personally I adore it, it's absolutely brilliant), it still can't have an article if notability can't be verified. Hope this makes sense. --bonadea contributions talk 15:43, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Booth At The End


The article The Booth At The End has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced by anything but press released; does not appear to meet the notaiblity criteria

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:35, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Deborah Skinner Buzan


A tag has been placed on Deborah Skinner Buzan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Seduisant (talk) 02:02, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Deborah Skinner Buzan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deborah Skinner Buzan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Deborah Skinner Buzan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. causa sui (talk) 18:20, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Cut-and-paste move
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Our Home a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 04:00, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Nosso Lar a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 04:05, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Our Home (book)


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Our Home (book). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Nosso Lar. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Nosso Lar – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. 65.94.76.126 (talk) 04:08, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Death of Fredy Villanueva


A tag has been placed on Death of Fredy Villanueva requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Eduemoni↑talk↓  16:14, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Émilie Barthe article
Hi, Tradereddy. I just came across the Émilie Barthe article you created while looking at new articles. There does seem to be a few problems here regarding the intro, where it says that she was a judge and member of parliament, which doesn't seem to be the case. (The first woman Canadian MP was Agnes Macphail who was elected in 1921 and was the only woman in the house until 1935.)  I do think that she is notable of course - the Dictionary of Canadian Biography,entry would be enough for me, but there are issues with the article as it stands.  FlowerpotmaN &middot;(t) 23:19, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Correction
Those 19th-century photos you uploaded to Commons – they're very good, but when the form asks for the date, you're supposed to put the date that the photograph was taken, not the date it was uploaded. If the precise date isn't known, you can put the parameters indicating our best guess (for instance, I labeled the photo of Marguerite Vincent Lawinonkié as "no later than 1865"), or the decade, or even the century. At worst, you can put "unknown". DS (talk) 14:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

A page you started (Grakliani Hill) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Grakliani Hill, Tradereddy!

Wikipedia editor LavaBaron just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"good job"

To reply, leave a comment on LavaBaron's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Grakliani Hill at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 19:59, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Grakliani Hill
Hello! Your submission of Grakliani Hill at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 14:33, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Thankyou for the Barnstar
The page is greatly improved, but it's not entirely fixed yet. I'd like to improve the lead section, and I have some notes for expansion of the women in religion section prepared... Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 14:46, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I recognize that, but I'm just glad to see someone contributing a lot of time and effort into an article, while also including strong citation.Tradereddy (talk) 20:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Grakliani Hill
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Women in Classical Athens Peer Review
You probably don't remember, but you gave me my first ever barnstar more than a year ago for my work on Women in Classical Athens. I got it through GAN recently, and am aiming to get it to FAC, so thanks for the early encouragement! The reason I bring it up now is that I have just submitted it for peer review here. It'd be great if you could drop by and give it a look. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 21:03, 27 April 2016 (UTC)


 * I do remember. Indeed, I still keep a close eye to the evolution of that page and the edits you have made on closely related articles. I am not much for doing anything on Wikipedia aside from editting; your first ever barnstar had been the first I had given and remains the only one I have given. With this as case, I will try to lend some of my time to get the article approved. Thank you once again for all your efforts.
 * Tradereddy (talk) 11:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Seven sages
Hello User:Tradereddy, I saw your revert of my edit here. I will not contest it. You are right in this matter and I was a bit too quick on my feet. The point is that I'm somewhat worried about the edit behavior of the user who introduced that link, User:203.188.231.225, who has the long standing habit of inserting WP:POV statements in sourced text, that are not actually supported by the sources given. So there is a history of problematic behavior there. Thank you for seeing beyond that however. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 19:18, 30 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I really appreciate you coming and posting this paragraph. I looked into the history of the editor after you removed the link as I had suspected some sort of misconduct could be present. I made similar observations regarding the user's editing behaviour, yet, the aforemention edit seemed harmless. Thank you for not contesting the edit and reaching out to me. Tradereddy (talk) 17:51, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

New 10,000 Challenge for Canada
Hi, WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge is up and running based on The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as The North America Destubathon to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

""François Recanati"" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect &. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 26 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:46, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SammyYatimGraffitiStreet.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SammyYatimGraffitiStreet.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 14 March 2024 (UTC)