User talk:Tradeskillsllc

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --tjstrf talk 09:35, 20 November 2006 (UTC)


 * It's not his fault, actually. I doubt he was the one who tagged it for WP:SPEEDY deletion. Herostratus deleted over 50 pages yesterday, all of which were probably tagged for deletion by other people, not him. most of them were either attack pages ("Eric Jones is a fag"), copyright violations from other sites, or pages about organizations that didn't assert their Notability. What/who did you write about? --tjstrf talk 09:52, 20 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The Wheel of Buddhist Terms? Hmm, that's... quite the interesting article subject. I can see why it was marked for deletion, it practically screams "not notable". If you want it kept, I suggest you list what magazines have used it as an illustration, preferably with page numbers and dates provided. That also might not be enough to have it kept, but it should be enough to make it require a full Articles for deletion debate rather than just being speedily deleted. (It would also help if you didn't type in all caps, btw.)
 * Remember, Wikipedia has a lot of people, so it only works when the users Assume good faith in each other's actions. (Sort of the Wikipedian version of Right Mindfulness... which we apparently don't have an article on. WTF?) Try not to take things too personally, especially at first. --tjstrf talk 10:18, 20 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Hello. Regarding your comments to User:tjstrf, I suggest you read both WP:NPA and WP:OWN, before you are blocked for vandalism and disruptive incivility. The Crying Orc 11:20, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Actually, you haven't included references. You say it was in some magazines, but which ones? Is there anything else notable about it? That's the type of information you need to include in order to have a keepable article. (Also, you know that thing I mentioned about not typing in all caps? It would be nice.) Anyway, I'm going to bed. If you have any requests for help, please feel free to ask me. --tjstrf talk 11:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I certainly don't mean to harass you, but edit summaries like 'I AM WORKING ON MY PAGE AND YOUR STUPID TAGS WERE NOT RELEVANT WHEN I CLICKED SAVE PAGE BECAUSE I HAD INCLUDED REFRENCES STAY THE **** OFF MY PAGE' do tend to catch one's eye when they show up in one's watchlist. I don't even know what article you're so concerned about, and frankly couldn't care.  I was just giving you a bit of advice, that's all.  And DO NOT LEAVE MESSAGES ON MY TALK PAGE IN ALL CAPITALS OR THEY WILL BE DELETED.  Get it? Have fun with 'your' article then. The Crying Orc 11:28, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm not harassing you. I'm being as polite as humanly possible, and trying to lead you into compliance with Wikipedia's policies. If you feel like reporting me for something, the proper page would be WP:AN/I, though I have no clue what infraction it would be for. Assuming good faith? Being nice? Helping a new member? --tjstrf talk 11:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

On this edit of yours, whose summary is I was editing the page when you jumped in with your idiotic anal edits encyclopedia artilces are not written instantainously and you have harrased me enough I am reporting you. -- Hoary 14:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * You may be within your rights to call others' edits "idiotic" but it's a strange way of winning friends and influencing people.
 * I can assure you that the editor you're addressing does not edit with his or her anus.
 * Encyclopedia articles are indeed not written instantaneously (however spelled); however, the good editor takes pains to follow Wikipedia's guidelines at every stage.
 * I'm disturbed to hear of harassment (however spelled). I see none. Could you have perhaps imagined it? If I've overlooked something and the harassment is real, do please report it, probably to WP:AN/I as suggested above. But readers there will only be interested in rational, persuasive argument, not in mere bluster.