User talk:Traditional unionist/Archives/2007/April

Army role in Northern Ireland
That may be your opinion, but you are welcome to check exactly what the book says here. You are also welcome to check other sources which say the same thing, here, here and here. I could provide more, but that's enough to adequately demonstrate my point. One Night In Hackney 303 13:28, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * That said, I've given it some more thought. The current version might portray the Catholic population as innocent victims in all of it. While that is in part true, there is no doubt there were both aggressors and innocent victims on both sides. If you provide a source stating that the Army were introduced to restore law and order, I'll be happy for that to be added as well. One Night In Hackney 303 01:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:NPOV, which states All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), representing fairly and without bias all significant views that have been published by reliable sources. I've already agreed that the current version may be slightly unbalanced and said I'd be happy with the sourced addition of their role being to restore law and order as well, but I've provided four sources which confirm the addition I made and can easily find more. You initially called the claim "laughable POV", but it's been published by reliable sources and therefore merits inclusion. One Night In Hackney 303 14:47, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I wasn't planning on using the American military one, I was just using that to show it isn't an isolated view held by just one particular author. Now I'm definitely not suggesting this is to be used as a reliable source, but please look at this. British schoolchildren are taught that the Army were deployed to protect Catholics against sectarian attack, and to restore law and order. I'll have a look through some of my books later and try and balance it out more. One Night In Hackney 303 14:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Flag Template
Please try to sign you comments, thanks Billtheking 15:49, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Your rude manner set aside, of course.Traditional unionist 17:17, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

No Personal attacks
Where exactly did I act rude against you? Accusing me of rude manners when I am just trying to inform you that you forgot to sign your post, CAN and WILL be seen as a personal attack. Thanks Billtheking 14:15, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Followup

 * Please do not accuse me of threatening you, which I have clearly not done. If you continue to accuse me, I will ask for mediation (WP:M) by an administrator. I have assumed good faith with you, I ask you to return the favor. If neccesary please read WP:AGF. Thanks, Billtheking 18:26, 29 April 2007 (UTC)