User talk:Tragen

aka Joseph Moshier, residing near Hartford, CT USA

Image copyright problem with Image:Zeus_system_2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Zeus_system_2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:57, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

framing merge proposal
Please see Talk:Framing (sociology). - Grumpyyoungman01 13:58, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Powershift: Knowledge, Wealth and Violence at the Edge of the 21st Century
Hi. Unfortunately I had to prune the article you created at Powershift: Knowledge, Wealth and Violence at the Edge of the 21st Century for reasons that I put on the article's talk page. Of course an Alvin Toffler book would certainly be notable; however the article would need to be rewritten from scratch. FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 00:03, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Wave disk engine for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wave disk engine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Wave disk engine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:58, 9 April 2011 (UTC)