User talk:Tragino

PF
I take it you are new to this because you havent added much on here. Dont start an edit war over this and next time you add a point on my talk page ADD YOU NAME!!!!!!!!!! (Archangel1 (talk) 22:53, 11 November 2008 (UTC)).

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk | Sign 11:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

RE: Your message
Please note that I have replied to you on my talk page. Thanks. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 15:29, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Market Garden
Did i hit a sore spot? Am so sorry - i applogise deeply that you are unable to read a comment hidden within the text that states not to add certain commanders to the list and read the talk page if you disagree. Again my deepest applogises.--EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 15:03, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Regimental Police
Please, never, ever, switch redirects manually. Only do it by moving. You have now messed up the edit history. On the point of Regimental Police/Provost, yes they are called Provost Sergeants and Provost Staff. Royal Military Police companies are called Provost Companies and their senior officers are Provost Marshals and the RMP is sometime referred to collectively as the Provost (e.g. their official history, Bloody Provost). Does that mean we should move Royal Military Police to Royal Military Provost? RPs are called Regimental Police. They have always been called Regimental Police. A single, solitary reference in a report is not a reason to move an entire article to a name that is rarely used. In addition, note that the article is not just about RPs in Britain! -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

British Army Man power
What your trying to do dosent make any sense, and I can obviously tell your new to DASA.

View source and click "View Entire Publication (PDF)" http://www.dasa.mod.uk/applications/newWeb/www/index.php?page=48&thiscontent=160&date=2010-03-02&pubType=1&PublishTime=09:30:06&from=home&tabOption=1

British army has 101,190 trained personel as seen on page 4 "Table 1 - Full time trained strengths and requirements of UK Armed Forces1"

However on page 6 "Table 2 - Strength of UK Armed Forces1 - full time trained and untrained personnel" this table includeds Trained and untrained personel and breaks them down in categories.

It Puts UK regular forces for the British army at 109,000+ and the trained strength of that at 96,000+ (note this doesnt include Gurkhas or FTRS like Table 1 does of page 4). The Gurkhas and FTRS of the British Army are included just below in Full Time UK Non-Regular Forces4 of which there are 6,080. You just them have to work out as to which service they fit into.

DASA doesnt make it easy hehehe, but make sure you know what your doing before you make edits next time ok. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rademire2 (talk • contribs) 10:41, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Modern equipment of the British Army
Hi you keep changing Challenger ARRV - I think if the British Army lists it as an engineering vehicle that's a reliable source. Can you list one that states its not an engineering vehicle ? Here is the link  --Jim Sweeney (talk) 17:43, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Recce units
Good spot on the BRF in the Recce article. I wondered what your thoughts were on including the SRR in that article, given that the type of work they do isn't really reflected in the article. The issue is probably sourcing, the only wiki-reliable are newspapers and two books that date their descriptions from the 80s.

ALR (talk) 09:23, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

East Surrey Regiment
Hi Tragino

Thanks for attempting first aid on East Surrey Regiment. My original TNA ref is still damaged though. I'll fix it myself but please note my comments on User_talk:Terryleary first as I intend to revert the whole edit unless other supporting refs are forthcoming. Please see what you think if you have time. -- KenBailey (talk) 13:05, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)