User talk:Trainmoney1

February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rachel Unitt, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rachel Unitt was changed by Trainmoney1 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-02-04T21:22:27+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:22, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Rachel Unitt constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Rror (talk) 21:28, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Rachel Unitt
Howdy, I went ahead and removed the second nomination for Rachel Unitt deletion. It seems the issue you have is copyright; have you looked over the latest version? Black Kite tried to revert to the last version without a copyright infringement. If you still see an issue, we can revert further back. The link you provided in the first AfD, rachel-unitt.co.uk, does not seem to go anywhere. If you'd like to contact me, feel free to leave a note on the bottom of my talk page, User_talk:TeaDrinker. We do take copyright seriously here and we should get to the bottom of this. Thanks for the work, --TeaDrinker (talk) 23:09, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up, and don't worry about getting everything right the first time. Wikipedia is rather confusing to navigate everything. I have gone ahead and listed it at copyright problems, which replaces the page with a copyright notice.  As far as the sponsor and other information, we try to get everything right but don't always succeed.  If you spot something in error, you can just change it yourself or make a note on the talk page if something is difficult to change (or there is disagreement, sources vary, you're not sure how to make the change, etc.).  We try to present a neutral view, and to that end prefer if people closely connected to the topic (such as the subject of a biography) do not edit the page themselves; this is summarized in our conflict of interest guideline.
 * As far as the Rachel Unitt page, is it your memory of the site that makes you think this is a copyright violation or are you associated with the site or Ms. Unitt? I have searched archived copies of the rachel-unitt.co.uk on the internet archive and have been unable to find similar text.  Any help here would be greatly appreciated.  Best wishes, --TeaDrinker (talk) 23:49, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Vanishing
Howdy, thanks for the note. I'll go ahead and note that the problem has been resolved at copyright problems. In general we don't delete (or more properly, remove from public view) parts of the page history without a reason, and requests for deletion, or edits to administrative pages, etc. are virtually never deleted. I apologize if this is not the answer you were looking for. If you need to contact me privately, you can use Special:Emailuser/TeaDrinker (although you will have to have entered your email address in my preferences). Feel free to write another note on my talk page if I can be of any other help. Thanks and best wishes, --TeaDrinker (talk) 22:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC)