User talk:Trakplug05

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Notability of Tightie Whities
A tag has been placed on Tightie Whities requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Happy Editing! &mdash;  05:02, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stellar Communications


A tag has been placed on Stellar Communications, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. 28bytes (talk) 19:41, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Replying here to your talk page comment regarding Stellar Communications
It's not the fact that it's a company that's the problem. The main problem is that it's written from the company's point of view ("We hope one day we will have more hot spots available..."). Compare the Cox Communications article: you don't see "we" and "us" in there. If Stellar Communications is notable enough to merit an article, it cannot be written from the company's point of view, it must be written from a neutral point of view.

Secondly, the article is unreferenced; you will need to provide coverage of the company in reliable sources (for example, a newspaper article about the company) to demonstrate that it is notable enough to merit an encyclopedia entry.

Thirdly, it is strongly discouraged for people who work for or with a company to be the ones to write an article about it. It is best to allow someone else, who is not tied to the company, to write an unbiased article, again using the reliable source coverage as the basis for the article's content.

I hope this helps explain why the article as it stands now cannot be included; if you have any questions, please feel free to contact me on my talk page and I will try to assist. 28bytes (talk) 20:35, 9 March 2011 (UTC)