User talk:Trancewarez

June 2010
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, instead of writing it yourself, as you did at Vandall‎. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. -- Rrburke (talk) 22:34, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your information. I understand there was a stub page creation due to my inclusion as an artist on a genre page at one point but the genre page was changed. My tracks are listed as notable tracks and feature on notable products on the following wiki pages however : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tech_trance, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alphazone. Certainly all facts are verifiable and there is probably as much notability as one could expect in an underground dance genre. Trancewarez (talk) 22:51, 7 June 2010 (UTC)