User talk:Transitionrenewal

April 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on 2011 Libyan civil war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 22:59, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article 2011 Libyan civil war, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 22:59, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to 2011 Libyan civil war appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 22:59, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at 2011 Libyan civil war, you may be blocked from editing. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 23:18, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * clarification has already been made at the talkpage for the Libya war. You need to explain how describing the war as 'against Gaddafi's rule' is more neutral than explaining it is for power and control in the region including being against his rule (for a faction), and against that of Jalil and against foreign intervention (for the larger and largely prevailing faction)Transitionrenewal (talk) 23:33, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I replied to your clarification at the article talkpage. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 23:34, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at 2011 Libyan civil war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 23:50, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * References supplied in the remainder of the article make it abundantly clear that war aims of significant combatants in the Libya war include opposing Transitionism and foreign intervention. That is now being reflected in the lead for the sake of balance and comprehensiveness.Transitionrenewal (talk) 00:10, 10 April 2011 (UTC)