User talk:TransporterMan

Removal at WP:3O
Hi, could you tell me why you removed the request ? We were still waiting for a third opinion and neither of us has moved on. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 06:33, 16 February 2023 (UTC)


 * As it said in my edit comment: "Stale, on list > 6 days, see instructions". If you'd done that, you would have found at Third_opinion: "Requests are subject to being removed from the list if no volunteer chooses to provide an opinion within six days after they are listed below. If your dispute is removed for that reason (check the history to see the reason), please feel free to re-list your dispute if you still would like to obtain an opinion—indicate that it's been re-listed in your entry. If removed a second time due to no volunteer giving an opinion, please do not relist again." Generally, if a 3O request hasn't been taken by a volunteer in the first six days, it's not going to happen (and most relistings don't get a response, either). If you still need dispute resolution, it would probably be better to move on to DRN or RFC. — TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 18:46, 17 February 2023 (UTC)


 * So WP:3O is pretty much useless if no one answers it. Got it. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 09:36, 18 February 2023 (UTC)


 * All dispute resolution at Wikipedia - like, indeed, all of Wikipedia - is run by volunteers, so no one is required to do anything. 3O is especially that way since the opinions are nonbinding and can be largely offhand. My observation is that despite those factors, 3O solves a dispute in well more than half the cases. — TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 23:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

DRN
Heya just wanted to let you know I have put my name as a volunteer for DRN. I was on this list many years ago but at the time was probably too busy to do it effectively. I apologise for that. However I would like to try this again and am happy to help out. I am familiar with the rules and many of the relevant policies, I am also on the Ombuds Commission which would hopefully never come up in your cases here. But I am experienced at dealing with disputes. My own specialty is science so may be most helpful in those types of cases. Cheers Scott Thomson  ( Faendalimas ) talk 18:57, 12 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Welcome back to the Wikipedia DR community. (Sorry for the slow response, I've been out of the country and mostly offline for the last five weeks.) I look forward to seeing you around, though I'm pretty much semi-retired at the moment. Best regards, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 21:45, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Unusual dispute situation
Greetings! I want to resolve a dispute with another editor, but the usual methods (such as Talk pages) won't help. S/He reverted some changes to a small article of mine ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Light_(short_story) ), saying in the edit summary merely that the text "Was much clearer before". However, as I noted in the Talk page that I created for the article ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Star_Light_(short_story) ), "the editor uses only an IP address (128.135.98.200) and has not established a personal Talk page." In the ensuing couple of weeks there has been no activity at the Talk page, so I cannot show any Talk history to use in discussion/mediation. (That's why I titled this section "Unusual dispute situation".) I disapprove of anonymous "hit and run" editing, but (as I noted) I don't want to just play "revert the reversions" (a.k.a. edit war). I want to settle this by discussion, but I can't -- not directly. Can you help me with this, please?

Thanks, Silverhill (talk) 19:46, 16 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry for the slow response, but I've been out of the country and mostly offline for the last five weeks. This is a tough one for me because I happen to agree with the IP editor's changes, which are clearly superior to the text they replaced. The much bigger problem, however, is that your article needs sources to indicate notability, which is the threshold for articles to be included in Wikipedia. Until those are added, the article is subject to deletion or draftification. Regards, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 22:03, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Requesting inputs

 * Requesting inputs @ Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Legal
 * This request has been made to you since you seem to have been interested in updating policies @ Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal vide your then reverted edit

&#32;Bookku   (talk) 17:32, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

The Third Option Request
I am personally glad that the request was reverted. I am not at all surprised to hear that it didn't comply with the instructions at the Third Opinion page as you put it, and had a discussion which involved more than two editors. In many ways, the issue really stemmed from edits on the Bob Morley page, where there continues to be an ongoing discussion. I'm not aware of a discussion on WP:RSN currently, though, just ones on Talk:Bob Morley and Talk:Arryn Zech. Historyday01 (talk) 18:01, 17 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Whoops. The discussion is at WP:BLPN, not WP:RSN and I've appended a note to that effect to my earlier notice. Thanks, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 18:17, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Intervention in Dispute resolution
Hello Sir, kindly intervene in my dispute with user Ekdalian. The link of the DR page is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/request. It is related to Baidya article. Thankyou. Anirban Kolkata (talk) 11:04, 30 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Your request for dispute resolution should be made at Dispute Resolution Noticeboard after carefully reading and following the instructions there. Requests cannot be made from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/request. I do not take private requests for dispute resolution. Regards, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 19:51, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

In memory
Today: in memoriam Jerome Kohl who said (In Freundschaft): "and I hope that they have met again in the beyond and are making joyous music together" -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:31, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Arbitration case request
You have been mentioned in a request for arbitration by DTParker1000 - possibly they consider you involved in some way, possibly they just asked you for advice as someone uninvolved (it's not immediately clear to me). Please see Arbitration/Requests/Case. Thryduulf (talk) 22:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Rio Grande 223 case request declined
The Rio Grande 223 case request has been declined. For the Arbitration Committee, House Blaster  (talk · he/they) 21:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)