User talk:Transsexual Queen

Speedy deletion nomination of Anne ogborn


A tag has been placed on Anne ogborn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Hasteur (talk) 15:15, 14 September 2010 (UTC) Anne Ogborn is an important figure in GLBT history. She is noted at the GLBT historical society of San Fransico, CA. Her work to help glbt people is mentioned in my article that was deleted. Please consider bringing it back. Thank you.
 * Putting a large indentation at the front of your comment makes it very hard to read comments and articles. Wiki formatting will take care of most indentation for you.  It's up for nomination because the article does not cite any outside references and is only self-referentially asserting it's notability.  Are there any news articles about her work?  How about her being mentioned in a book for doing her work?  I'll be happy to pull down the CSD nominaton, but getting at least one verifyable and reputable source would qualify this article.  Alternatives are to take the article to a userspace draft to get it to a presentable state, taking the article to the incubator to get it up to a better state. Hasteur (talk) 17:56, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Meiosis XY Female Syndrome for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Meiosis XY Female Syndrome, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Meiosis XY Female Syndrome until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  02:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

September 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tim Fish, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! Thank you. -- &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 02:16, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Anne Ogborn for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anne Ogborn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Anne Ogborn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ysangkok (talk) 16:26, 20 February 2014 (UTC)