User talk:TravelKing40

Hello TravelKing40,

Thank you for your comments on Nektarios Tavernarakis. I have responded in the relevant talk page and copy below:

This page should not be speedily deleted because Nektarios Tavernarakis fulfils the Wikipedia criteria for notability. He is one of the most prominent bioscientists in Greece and his work has received wide international and European recognition. He has been awarded numerous highly competitive prizes and distinctions. I have listed some of the most prestigious awards. He has also published studies in top tier international journals such as Nature and others. In addition he has been honored by several international scientific societies and has been elected member of EMBO and Academia Europaea. These are two of the most prominent scientific societies in Europe. He has also been awarded the highly prestigious European Research Council (ERC) advanced research grant (2.5 million euro; references are included).

I have included this information with relevant references. I have not overstressed it to avoid pompousness. I kept the style neutral and down to the facts, to conform to Wikipedia stipulations.

Kastritis (talk) 08:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi TravelKing40! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 18:48, Thursday, September 10, 2015 (UTC)

BLPPRODs
Hi TravelKing40,

I noticed that you have tagged some articles for deletion with BLPPRODs that weren't actually eligible for deletion by BLPPROD. The BLPPROD policy seems to confuse a lot of people in that it has a different standard for adding a BLPPROD and removing one. Basically, if there is any reference or external link in the article that mentions anything about the subject, then BLPPROD cannot be used on the article. This is true even if the external link isn't a reliable source or otherwise shouldn't be used as a reference. An article can be "unsourced" in the sense that it has no reliable references, but still be ineligible for BLPPROD due to having external links. If an article truly has no references or external links (or if none of them actually mentions the subject), then a BLPPROD can be added, and at that point it can only be removed if a reliable source is added. So basically, what I am getting at is that you shouldn't add BLPPRODs to articles with external links (unless you determine that the links don't mention the subject), even if those articles don't have any reliable references. Calathan (talk) 18:52, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks for the clarification Calathan - will consider that in the future. Perhaps Ken Yamamura was one example. It was nominated for A7, which I think the external references negate... but the article quality (IMO) is quite poor and I couldn't really add anything to improve it. In this example, what would you do (if anything) to tag/highlight that it needs work?TravelKing40 (talk) 19:23, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * For an article like that, you could consider tagging it with Template:no footnotes if you think some of the external links could be usable as actual references. If none of the external links look like they would make good references, then tagging it with Template:BLP sources or Template:BLP unsourced would probably be good. Calathan (talk) 19:36, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

New Page Patrol
Hi. Thank you for patrolling new pages. NPP is not for beginners. You are a very new user and you would generally need a lot more experience before trying your hand at patrolling new pages. There are easier tasks such as Counter Vandalism that would enable you to get your feet wet on maintenance tasks more easily. As soon as you have over 200 mainspace edits you can enroll at the WP:CVUA to learn more about it. Happy editing! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:57, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!