User talk:TravisShergold

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock or meat puppetry. On the basis of your edits it appears that you're related to the ring of sock puppets investigated at Sockpuppet investigations/MileyFan1990. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nick-D (talk) 11:55, 26 August 2010 (UTC)


 * As a note for the reviewing admin, see also User talk:TheScream7. This is plainly the same editor on the basis of their contributions. Nick-D (talk) 12:06, 26 August 2010 (UTC)


 * As a "note for the reviewing admin", I am NOT User talk:TheScream7. I think the reviewing admin ought to consider the relationship between Nick-D and Timeshift9 who violently binned my account before I even got to finish my edits to this page. No talk page discussion to engage with me about the edits, no letting some stay and some go - instant binning of an account. I feel this clearly violates Wikipedia's principles. TravisShergold (talk) 12:11, 26 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Also for the reviewing admin, did Timeshift9 ask Nick-D to make the change, and what relationship do they have? Since Timeshift9 did the initial undo and Nick-D binned my account, you have to wonder in particular about Timeshift9's NPOV, if he is the same as the guy who took and I take it approved of this photograph It appears from my searching online tonight (just google Timeshift9) the self-appointed God of the Bob Day page (and it seems others about Family First members of Parliament) is a Labor stooge who will keep editwarring these articles to a LPOV (Labor Point of View) not a NEUTRAL point of view. Wikipedia, your credibility is on the line.


 * As I suspected, I am talking to a bureaucratic brick wall. Nobody sought to constructively engage with the edits I was making, using the Talk Page. I am a Wikipedia editor but suspected this attack would happen, hence I started a new account since I want to continue editing in peace. I have faith in the NPOV of Wikipedia but not when it comes to articles about politics, evidently TravisShergold (talk) 23:32, 26 August 2010 (UTC)