User talk:Travisadennison

Speedy deletion nomination of Denzil Porter
Hello Travisadennison,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Denzil Porter for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

scope_creep (talk) 23:41, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Denzil Porter, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Cahk (talk) 07:35, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Denzil Porter
Hi Travisadennison. I see you are updating the article, but it still needs substantial sources to satisfy BLP. The current reference is not enough. If they are not added, then the article will be going WP:AFD process, in the next couple of weeks. When I classed it for WP:COI and deletion, it automatically completed the review process, but with all the dud ref's being removed, the review is no longer valid. So please add verifiable sources as soon as possible. scope_creep (talk) 10:58, 29 March 2017 (UTC)