User talk:Travish212

Speedy deletion nomination of RepairQ
Hello Travish212,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged RepairQ for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

J bh Talk  22:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of RepairQ


A tag has been placed on RepairQ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JarrahTree 15:28, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to RepairQ. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 15:41, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:RepairQ
I've moved your article to Draft:RepairQ where you can work on it. In particular I'd draw your attention to the advice contained in the welcome message on your talk page, especially the links Citing sources and External links. I'll also mark it up for WP:AfC so that you can have it reviewed before having it promoted to the wiki's mainspace. Hopefully this will give you a less bruising experience. Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 16:39, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

You should also read "Identifying reliable sources" - the sources you've provided are mostly PR material which lack any independence. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and we aim to maintain a neutral point of view. Cabayi (talk) 16:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback. As you can tell, this is new for me! --Travish212 (talk) 17:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

I will continue working on the draft. Any chance you could give me a little feedback on the current draft? --Travish212 (talk) 22:33, 6 January 2017 (UTC)


 * I've cleared out a load of the promotional sounding language, and restructured the article's lede (the article's supposed to be about RepairQ not Brickwire). The article still relies on PR material. It needs independent, verifiable sources if it's going to stand any chance of showing that the product is notable. Cabayi (talk) 11:50, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your help! I will try to find some more/different sources. It's a relatively small company, even with a large footprint in the industry. So I had a tough time finding more articles. I'll keep digging. Thank you again!!! --Travish212 (talk) 13:20, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: RepairQ (January 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RepairQ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  17:33, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:RepairQ has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:RepairQ. Thanks! SwisterTwister  talk  17:51, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:RepairQ


Hello, Travish212. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "RepairQ".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Cabayi (talk) 19:31, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:RepairQ concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:RepairQ, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:RepairQ


Hello, Travish212. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "RepairQ".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JustaZBguy (talk) 23:24, 18 January 2018 (UTC)