User talk:Tre4

Your edit to Ugg boots
In this edit, you add (for the second time) a link to what appears to be a forgettable little essay praising the ugg boots of one particular company. Please don't add it again. Thank you. -- Hoary 14:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

So you ignored that and added it a third time. Please either explain why it is worthwhile or stop adding it again. -- Hoary 23:49, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

I did not ignore that - if you look at the third edit you will notice that there was not a sngle mention of any company - did you read it? what was wrong this time?

I don't want to offend anyone or break the rules so please explain why my last post was wrong - many thanks


 * Fair enough.


 * I've just revisited the article as it was immediately after you last revised it. I clicked the link, to a page within lfaboots.com. The first time I followed that link, it (not surprisingly) praised ugg boots from lfaboots.com. Now it doesn't; so right, adding a link to it is hardly advertising. However, the linked page is also uninformative: it's merely a very short comment by some guy who says he likes to wear ugg boots. Of course lfaboots.com is welcome to have it on its website, but I don't see how it merits a link from a WP article. -- Hoary 10:30, 23 March 2007 (UTC)