User talk:TreeOfKnowledge

Moseley's law
Hi TreeOfKnowledge, check this user carefully because he's continuously spamming the whole Wikimedia project in order to massively advertise his pseudoscientific "work". He's not a true expert of physics nor of mathematics, and Moseley's law is still valid and taught in all universities (he says that he confuted this law). He's not an academic and didn't publish any peer reviewed paper, he's only a cheater searching for some notoriety. --Cisco79 (talk) 16:49, 3 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello Cisco79, thanks for the heads up. To be fair, it is difficult to find a citation in recent literature directly stating that Moseley's Law is only an approximation.  The introduction to chemistry/physics texts make no mention of it, and advanced chemistry/physics texts start with the Rydberg formula and only mention Moseley's Law in passing if mentioned at all.  At least now the article references the NIST data, and anyone with an understanding of rise over run can realize it is not linear.  Perhaps someone can find a published peer-reviewed paper that bluntly points that out.  I've pretty much exhausted much of the recent literature (over a dozen chemistry/physics books) owned or capable of being previewed.  I can see how a student may be mislead into believing Moseley's Law is perfect.


 * Most textbooks are written for their customers, students, who only need them to bubble in the right answers on tests, not perform actual chemistry or physics experiments, and so those little details of reality are scrubbed as frivolous and unimportant, unfortunately.
 * TreeOfKnowledge (talk) 04:36, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi TreeOfKnowledge, in the end the truth always comes to light. I want to inform en: Wikipedia that a procedure for personal attacks has been concluded against Cisco79 (talk) https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Utenti_problematici/Cisco79/4 I hope that also en: Wikipedia takes serious measures in about the heavy personal attacks iterated on my person by Cisco79 (talk) on your talk. For further clarity, I am not a cheater, nor an academic. I am an Independent Researcher fighting for the truth. Furthermore, I hope that a vandalism procedure will be opened against Cisco79 (talk) for its appointment of cancellation on Wikimedia of my contents which fortunately have been kept.--Starace Aniello (talk) 15:53, 10 April 2021 (UTC)