User talk:Treehugger35

Speedy deletion nomination of Aaron Collis


A tag has been placed on Aaron Collis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. MadD (talk) 22:16, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at St. Bride's, Newfoundland and Labrador. ''You do know that blanking your warnings does not prevent us from seeing them, right? Stop adding this unsourced non-notable.'' Meters (talk) 03:00, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Appleton, Newfoundland and Labrador. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 03:01, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Stop adding unsourced non-notables to Appleton, Newfoundland and Labrador. Making the edit five times is disruptive. You blanked the warning about this, which means that we consider that you acknowledge having seen it. We don't list people as notable unless they have a Wikipedia article to show their notability, and a reliable source to show their connection to the town. has neither. Simply being a member of a notable group does not make one notable.  Meters (talk) 23:34, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:35, 1 May 2021 (UTC)