User talk:Treetree3

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nabi Tajima. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Marbe166 (talk) 15:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Diane Parish does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. I have reverted your edit because I don't understand why you made the change to the date of birth template. 5 albert square (talk) 01:56, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

May 2018
Hello, I'm Nanophosis. An edit that you recently made to Charlie Brooks seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Nanophosis (talk) 23:51, 2 May 2018 (UTC)