User talk:TrekkerPrime06

Welcome!

Hello, TrekkerPrime06, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Holz Scholbeck, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 06:49, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Holz Scholbeck


A tag has been placed on Holz Scholbeck requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 06:49, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Holz Scholbeck. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Legion fi (talk) 06:59, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

A suggestion
I see that the article you are working on Holz Scholbeck, is in danger of disappearing shortly. Based upon my very cursory review of it, I can say it is not yet ready, but it sounds like it could be, with some work. I have a suggestion that may help. The page could be moved to a subpage of your user account, which is a common way to start a new article. Some of the rules still apply (no attacks allowed) but that doesn't sound like a problem. The advantage is that editors won't be pushing for it to be deleted on the basis that it has no references and no credible assertions of notability. It would give you time to pull that information together, and get it into better shape. When you think it is ready, you can post a request at Requests for feedback, and someone will help let you know if it is ready, and possible next steps. If you see this note and find that the article has been deleted, all is not lost. We can recover it and copy it to a user subpage for you. Let me know if you want to do this, or mention it at the talk page (Just ask for the article to be userfied.)-- SPhilbrick  T  22:14, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your sujjestion. Yes I would like that page to be userfied, if you could also leave me instructions on how to access it, as I'm new to this wiki