User talk:Trentboden

Problems with upload of File:Tjf-inverted blue.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tjf-inverted blue.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Tjf-inverted blue.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tjf-inverted blue.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Skier Dude ( talk  19:29, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to The Jamestown Foundation has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  The Mi ke •Wassup doc? 06:10, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to The Jamestown Foundation constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  The Mi ke •Wassup doc? 06:14, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on The Jamestown Foundation. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Drmies (talk) 06:20, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
 * 3) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.