User talk:Trentspevacek

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. HarryHenryGebel 01:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

hey youre cool and i hope to talk soon! user: trentspevacek

AFI sucks LOL Jackjackjackjackjack 16:27, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wes Bentley, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Wes Bentley was changed by Trentspevacek (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-11-05T04:19:16+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 04:19, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ellie Marquez
A tag has been placed on Ellie Marquez requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. VivioFa teFan  (Talk, Sandbox) 00:48, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Ellie Marquez
While you may believe that anyone can write anything they want to on wikipedia, the community at large does not. Sorry, but those are the rules. --Fabrictramp (talk) 00:57, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Please see Notability for guidelines relating to the importance of biographical subjects in Wikipedia articles. The best way to prevent an article you believe is important from being deleted is to ensure it has some reliable external references, such as newspapers or other media, that reaffirm the notability of the subject. --Canley (talk) 01:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

User:Fabrictramp
Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Geniac (talk) 14:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Wikipedia:Protection policy‎, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 02:36, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Stephen Hillenburg.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Stephen Hillenburg.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

December 2008
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 02:59, 13 December 2008 (UTC)