User talk:Trestoncooklincoln/sandbox

I think you’ve got a great start on updating the existing article. It was a little difficult to navigate without headings. The section discussing the studies of Uncertainty Reduction Theory is very informative. I would suggest splitting it up to avoid an overload in one paragraph.

There are some grammatical errors that will be very simple to correct. Ex1: Communication scholars have studied this theory and its effects on romantic when coupled with other variables. (I think there is a word missing after romantic)

Ex2: In romantic relationships studies have shown a relation with the Uncertainty Reduction Theory and its ability to predict the longevity of the relationship. (Comma after relationships)

Ex 2: Therefore, individuals must be honest with themselves about realizing compatibility rather than disregarding your feelings in order to only make your partner happy. (Because you used themselves, I would replace your feelings with their feelings as well as your partner to their partner)

Linking in to other existing Wikipedia pages will help add content to the article without having to actually find additional sources. There are long stretches without any citations. I would double check that there isn’t anything that might be missing a source. Also, don’t forget to update your citations to footnotes so your reference section will build itself. For your journal articles, if you have the URL or DOI, that will be helpful for anyone that would like to look at them.

You did a really good job keeping the overall tone neutral and just providing facts on the topic. Your information seems really solid. The original article is very long and not all of the sections seem necessary. Your revisions will help bring the article back on topic. SHRansom (talk) 02:19, 2 March 2019 (UTC)