User talk:Trevor7909/sandbox

Article evaluation
Lepidobatrachus laevis (Budgett's frog) Article link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lepidobatrachus_laevis

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? The overall ordering of headings was a bit distracting as it didn't seem to follow a very logical flow. I didn't find too much irrelevant information. Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? There are claims that the frog is aggressive and has a "disturbing screech". These claims do not seem to bias the article either way since they are only made in reference to its nicknames. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? The sub-sections seem short, to the point but lacking any supporting details Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Yes, know your meme, however, is not a reliable source. Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? No, many statements in this article are lacking any supporting citations. Any indication of bias is not made note of. Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? The most recent edit appears to be in October of this year so I wouldn't think anything is out of date. Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? The Wednesday frog controversy seems to be a hot discussion topic. I think the name should stay as it is a pop-culture reference and related to the article. How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? The article is rated both start-class and low-importance. It is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? We haven't talked about this article in class.