User talk:Trevor MacInnis/Archive 9

Pacific Air Lines
Hi, Mr MacInnes! You have kindly rated many aviation articles, including some I originated. You assessed the PAL article a while back. It has now been much expanded and improved. Would you care to look at it again sometime? I'm not familiar with assessing above 'start' ranking! Best wishes RuthAS (talk) 14:15, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)
The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:18, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

List of aircraft of the Canadian Forces Air Command
Thanks for fixing that ref! - Ahunt (talk) 17:38, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost : 10 August 2009 ==


 * Special story: Tropenmuseum to host partnered exhibit with Wikimedia community
 * News and notes: Tech news, strategic planning, BLP task force, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Shrinking community, GLAM-Wiki, and more
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 06:06, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Non-free images
Trevor, Re: File:Advanced Composite Cargo Aircraft.jpg and File:Advanced Composite Cargo.jpg, these images are clearly marked as "Courtesy" on the original source pages. This has been reviewed on Commons before, and many images have been removed, as the copyrights belong to a non-US government entitiy, usually the cmpany that makes the aircraft. Sorry! - BilCat (talk) 11:10, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Categorization of MUSTARD page
Hi, you added WP:MUSTARD to a category; please see a note about it here. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 16:32, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Reason: This is intended to be a biography for Jim Diamond aka Mega Genius for which I have recived permission from to be his offical biographer. I would be happy to revise the biography so that it does not reflect (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) by deleting website links changing the title to Jim Diamond instead of Mega Genius and sections of the biography. However his work is one of his personal accomplishments to be included in his biography.Deadalus821 (talk) 19:17, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost : 17 August 2009 ==


 * From the editor: Where should the Signpost go from here?
 * Radio review: Review of Bigipedia radio series
 * News and notes: Three million articles, Chen, Walsh and Klein win board election, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Reports of Wikipedia's imminent death greatly exaggerated, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:43, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Date linking
Hi Trevor,

Just saw your recent amendment to the av style guide and I agree (as it was written). I use Template:Avyear a lot but only in the infobox (as was agreed in a past project discussion I believe) and without the day and month being linked. I think this restricted use is 'germane' to the subject and relevant as the MOS states it needs to be. Should there be advice in the style guide as to its use? Whatever the advice it would help to stop mass additions or mass delinking, I watched the whole delinking ARBCOM saga, three of the editors (one banned for a year, two topic banned) 'tag-teamed' on my talk page over this after I objected to the mass delinking in aircraft articles. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by)   23:57, 17 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks Trevor, I'll have a look back through the archives although I don't think that any guideline was actually 'set in stone' as such. On a different subject I wonder if you can help the engine group with this idea? We can do the list, just wondering about the best place to put it. Cheers Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by)   09:26, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

ANI re Messerschmitt Bf 109
This ANI (Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents) may be of interest to you.Nigel Ish (talk) 19:21, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

An exciting opportunity to improve yourself!
As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. -  Trevor  MacInnis   contribs  05:24, 21 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Trevor: Thanks for the invitation! - Ahunt (talk) 12:27, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks a lot for your invitation to the Aviation Contest. I am honored. However, please apologize me for not signing up since I feel myself not qualified or advanced enough to fulfill the task required. I will do my best to contribute further in the project. I wish everyone the best in the contest. Cheers.CeeGee (talk) 11:44, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Same goes for me too, cheers! --Cyber Fox (talk) 11:30, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Discussion and poll on reviewer usergroup criteria
You may be interested in a discussion and poll I've started to decide the criteria that will be used for promoting users to the reviewer group at Wikipedia talk:Reviewers - please put your comments there. AndrewRT(Talk) 17:56, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Buffalo Bills tackle.jpg
File:Buffalo Bills tackle.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:J.P. Losman tackled in the end zone by Ty Warren 2006-09-10.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:08, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Admin help
Sorry to ask but I am having a bit of a civility problem with User:Davegnz. I asked to behave at but he has had another go at personal remarks at. I would be tempted to block him myself but as it is me he is insulting it may not be an appropriate use of Admin powers. Appreciate if you could have a look at his behaviour, any suggestions welcome. Thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 19:26, 5 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for you help. MilborneOne (talk) 17:59, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

User:ArtSyn I would like to ask if you could 'unprotect' the page for ARTICLE SUBMISSION so I may re-create it. It appears it was previously deleted and protected last year for not having any meaningful substantive content. I'd like to add a new page with an acceptable contribution for this site. Thank you for your consideration! —Preceding undated comment added 16:40, 30 August 2009 (UTC).

== Wikipedia Signpost : 24 August 2009 ==


 * News and notes: $500,000 grant, Wikimania, Wikipedia Loves Art winners
 * Wikipedia in the news: Health care coverage, 3 million articles, inkblots, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 07:03, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Yuck
Please look at User talk:Aupajo. Yellow text on white is virtually impossible to read. Also people who add stuff after you welcome message expect it to be in normal user talk font, colours, etc. Please fix soonest on this and any other pages you have used the message on. &mdash; RHaworth 07:26, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

swissair rfc
your input is invited at talk:Swissair, and the associated rfc regarding infobox parameters. --emerson7 23:56, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Reviewing
Hi, since you are impartial, would you mind assessing all the articles listed on my submissions page for the aviation competition. Thanks, --Plane Person (talk) 06:35, 3 September 2009 (UTC).

Contest scoring change
I've realized there may be an issue with the scoring system, and I have a solution, which I've explained here. Feedback is requested. -  Trevor  MacInnis   contribs  23:57, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

RfA
Was this you? -- Soap Talk/Contributions 23:51, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Oops, yes it was. I'll fix it. -  Trevor  MacInnis   contribs  23:55, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September! Many thanks,  Roger Davies  talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Contest
Hey, Trevor! I'll check out the contest and see what it is about. Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 07:27, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * of course I'm interested in the Aviation Contest but all my contributions are on my native language and the biggest project I’ve worked on is on wikibooks (as many other users writing about aviation only on local wikipedias). Maybe, if possible, to include other languages (English language + other languages) as a part of contest. Of course it will be very difficult to specify a quality of articles out of English but :-)). However, thanks a lot for invitation.--D  tom [[Image:Aero-stub img.svg]] 09:36, 23 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi Trevor. Thank you for offering a chance to join in the contest.  Right now, however, it doesn't look like I will have the time to make the kind of professional effort that such a project requires.  The US economy, and especially the economy in California, forces me to work much harder than before, just to put food on the table.  EditorASC (talk) 20:22, 26 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi Trevor, is there anything wrong with my Level Up submission or you have simply forgot to consider it? Cheers, --Eurocopter (talk) 10:27, 4 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi Trevor, sorry to disturb you again, I updated my submission page and there are some further improved articles so i'm not sure if I've done everything properly. Just wanna make sure that you will notice them. Cheers, --Eurocopter (talk) 14:50, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Question
Hello! I'm Airplaneman. I'm one of the participants in the Aviation contest. I have a Wiki-related question that's not related to the contest, and since you seem like an experienced editor, I thought I'd come here. My question is, did one always have to have an account to create articles? I was looking to see who created the article Wii a while back, and I believe it was an IP. My suspicions were confirmed when I saw who created Walter Lord's article. When did this policy change? I couldn't find any mention to them in the Wikipedia manuals I searched. Thanks. Regards, Airplaneman  talk 17:36, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

City Link Air
Hey Trevor: Just wanted to let you know I created this new article, so you can credit me with some points at the contest. Thanks and God bless you! ; Antonio Crazy Cool Martin''' tell me here 08:56, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Alt text for template image captions
Hi Trevor, a point raised in the Merlin FA process was that Alt text (WP:ALT) was not provided for the image captions. I fixed this apart from the infobox image which I had problems with, another editor fixed the template by adding a parameter in this diff. I guess that we have other templates that might need this facility, would add it myself but I'm not confident with the coding. Cheers Nimbus <font style="color:#2F4F4F;">(Cumulus <font style="color:#708090;">nimbus <font style="color:#D3D3D3;">floats by)   10:25, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Aviator006 (talk) 14:23, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Template:3-view
Hi, I've left a message at Template talk:3-view that you may be interested in. Regards, TheGrappler (talk) 02:09, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XXX
Delivered for the WikiCup by <font style="color:#006600;"> ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 19:38, 12 September 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)
The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:27, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Aviation Contest
Hi Trevor Maclennis. I was just wondering why my points weren't added for improvong Dubai International Airport and Emirates Airlines. They were both start class in August and now there B-Class. So shouldn't i receive the points? -- MoHasanie <font style="color:Black;background:Orange;"> Talk 20:37, 16 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Dubai International Airport wasn't a start class at the beginning of the contest, as I mentioned on your talk page before it was a B-class article that didn't have the checklist completed which is a requirement before you can start claiming "level up's". It hasn't improved significantly from its August 31st version, but if you improve it beyond B-class you will recieve points for that.


 * The same it true for Emirates Airlines. On August 31st this version of the article was B-Class. I fixed the checklist to show as such. this shows little improvement since August 31, but if you improved it above B-Class you will start receiving points. -  Trevor  MacInnis   contribs  22:32, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!
Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September! For the coordinators,  Roger Davies  talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Aero-derivative engins
Trevor, the Aeroengines Task Force is currently covering aero-derivative engine articles, most of which are not covered by other projects as yet. As a result, engines used in power generation and ships have WPAIR banners on their talk pages, such as Talk:Rolls-Royce Marine Trent. Is it possible/permissable to create a separate banner to make clear why these engines fall within the scope of WPAIR, or perhaps to modify the existing WPAIR banner to do this? I'd like to have something like "This aero-derivative engine article falls within the scope of the Aeroengines Task Force, part of WIkiProject Aircraft." Any ideas or suggestions? We can move this to WT:AETF for wider discussion if needed. Note that there are probably no more than 20-30 10 such articles at this time. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 04:48, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * It seems a bit excessive to modify the banner for 10 articles. How about using a Tmbox message? Perhaps:

-  Trevor  MacInnis   contribs  20:56, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Some advice needed
Hi Trevor, you might be aware of a trivial but immensely frustrating and annoying problem that is occuring in the engine articles, this has been going on for over a year now. I happened to notice this diff from one of the IPs today and reverted it back to the cited figure. Maybe you can do something or perhaps I should take it to ANI as it's getting beyond a joke now. Apart from that it's all going well!! Cheers Nimbus <font style="color:#2F4F4F;">(Cumulus <font style="color:#708090;">nimbus <font style="color:#D3D3D3;">floats by)   18:37, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009

 * From the editor: Call for opinion pieces
 * News and notes: Footnotes updated, WMF office and jobs, Strategic Planning and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wales everywhere, participation statistics, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Video games
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:08, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Contest Scoring
What is the scoring for creating an Aviation Template? I recently created Template:Major US Airports and would like to know what I will receive for that. <font face="segoe print, sans-serif"> Ishwasafishclick here!!! 19:37, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Template:Jetspecs
Hi Trevor, an editor in the engine task force has asked if a bypass ratio parameter can be added to 'Jetspecs', it would only be completed for turbofans obviously. I think it is a very good idea and the template is quite concise even with this addition. Perhaps it should appear after |Compression= if you are happy to insert this for us. Cheers Nimbus <font style="color:#2F4F4F;">(Cumulus <font style="color:#708090;">nimbus <font style="color:#D3D3D3;">floats by)   20:43, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 21:42, 26 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Marvellous, thanks, I will mention it at WT:AETF Cheers Nimbus <font style="color:#2F4F4F;">(Cumulus <font style="color:#708090;">nimbus <font style="color:#D3D3D3;">floats by)   21:59, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

MILHIST admins
Hi. Since you're an admin and a member of the Military History WikiProject, please consider listing yourself here. Cheers, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 19:50, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009

 * Opinion essay: White Barbarian
 * Localisation improvements: LocalisationUpdate has gone live
 * Office hours: Sue Gardner answers questions from community
 * News and notes: Vibber resigns, Staff office hours, Flagged Revs, new research and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Stunting of growth, Polanski protected and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:05, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)
The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 16:14, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Aviator006 (talk) 15:58, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Newark, O'Hare etc
Hey - I saw you've been fixing a few of the article names... Can you help with Turin International Airport? There's been a discussion about it already, and agreement that the name should be corrected to "Turin Airport". Can you help with doing that? Thanks. I'd do it myself - but I'm not sure how to go about getting the rights to do that. Jasepl (talk)
 * Thanks... You're a star! Jasepl (talk) 21:01, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009

 * New talk pages: LiquidThreads in Beta
 * Sockpuppet scandal: The Law affair
 * News and notes: Article Incubator, Wikipedians take Manhattan, new features in testing, and much more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia used by UN, strange AFDs, iPhone reality
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * WikiProject report: New developments at the Military history WikiProject
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 05:34, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Notability challenge
One of my stubs on a World War I ace has been marked for speedy deletion within minutes of my creating it. I have been creating stubs on any of the lower-scoring aces who was honored with a decoration. Now Edward Darby has been tagged for deletion, despite his honor of a Distinguished Conduct Medal. I take this to be a slippery slope situation; if one ace can be deleted because he has only a single decoration, then where is the line drawn? Will aces be deleteable at random? Will the administrators make up a table of some sort so decorations can be tallied and scored for notability? Will there be a cutoff point based on number o fvictories? If so, where will that leave the lower-scoring aces of merit, such as Pegoud? Et cetera, et cetera, ad nauseam.

Georgejdorner (talk) 22:07, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Common sense prevailed. Deletion tag removed.

Georgejdorner (talk) 18:23, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Ju 87 A-class review
Looks like the A-class review for the Junkers Ju 87 has blown its timelimit. Can you close it out? If not I can probably do it. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:34, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Disagreement about talk pages template
Whilst creating stubs on WWI flying aces, I have run into admins who disagree about how I should be creating Talk pages for these stubs. I temporarily knocked off creating these Talk pages, in hope agreement would be reached. At that time, I would backtrack and create the missing pages. Hasn't happened yet.

It is enough to evoke at least a tired sigh from a fellow, as it did with you. Actually, I'm amazed you did not groan.

Now, if you have a template for those Talk pages...

Georgejdorner (talk) 17:37, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Request
Trevor: Do you have the interest or ability to help out overseeing an article outside the Aviation Project? It is a Canadian subject and we are greatly in need of some "adult supervision", hopefully for a short period of time. I could use your experienced admin oversight. - Ahunt (talk) 23:47, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Request for comment/mediation
Hi. As an admin who dabbles in the scope of MILHIST, I was wondering if you would be willing to comment/mediate a minor dispute? The dispute is occurring on Tom Derrick over original research in an image, due to the identification of the medals contained in such. The discussion on the talk page here has stalled and is going no where, so I posted on the main MILHIST talk page here requesting comment, as I have no desire to engage in an edit war (I have already reverted the other editor's edits three times, and one more would truly place me in violation of WP:3RR), but also due to some rude comments directed at me I wish to "step back" and gain input from other editors. However, I thought it would be best if an uninvolved admin has a look over the whole thing, and possibly post their thoughts; hence why I am here. :) Please do not feel obligated or forced to do this if you are too busy, this is not an area you wish to work in, or you do not wish to. I have additionally posted this on User:Patar knight's talk page. Thank you, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 01:07, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Failed linkage
I have been creating stubs for those lower scoring aces that were decorated. (My POV being that their notability is proven by their being honored with a medal or order.)

At any rate, I thought to check over on your Canadian aces list, and I find that my stubs are not linking to your list. Upon investigation, I found you were using some sort of sorting wiki that baffles me, so that even when I change names to duplicate those on your list, they don't link.

I have created stubs for all decorated five-victory aces, and am starting on six-victory aces. I would suggest you link the Canadian stubs to your list. Then you will have a beginning on those aces.

Georgejdorner (talk) 06:14, 30 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I used the template Sortname on the Canadian list in order to sort them by last name instead of first (you'll notice that if you sort World War I aces credited with more than 20 victories by name then A.F.W. Beauchamp-Proctor comes up first). Most of the names on the list are formatted FIRSTNAME AND MIDDLE LASTNAME so in the case of Irving Corey is jsut a matter of changing Irving Banfield Corey to Irving Corey or if you want the middle name to still show on the list Irving Banfield Corey . I'll go thru the list and make the appropriate changes. Thanks for bringing this to my attention, and great work at creating the pages! - Trevor MacInnis contribs 13:02, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Rather than complicate your life, I have decided to lay off the Canadian aces I come across, and leave them to you.

Also, see other message below under Notability Challenge. I deem it very important.

Georgejdorner (talk) 22:07, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Oh, it's no problem at all. I'd prefer if you did continue to create the articles, as I don't really have the time right now, with other projects going on. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 01:09, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

That would result in my creating stubs only for decorated Canadian aces, not all Canadian aces.

Georgejdorner (talk) 02:31, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009

 * From the editor: Perspectives from other projects
 * Special story: Memorial and Collaboration
 * Bing search: Bing launches Wikipedia search
 * News and notes: New WMF hire, new stats, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: IOC sues over Creative Commons license, Wikipedia at Yale, and more
 * Dispatches: Sounds
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Tropical cyclones
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 04:32, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

French House +references
I had no idea is was possible to consolidate references within the reflist! It makes much more sense, thanks for doing that. pablo <sub style="text-shadow: 3px 3px 3px rgba(255,255,0,0.75); color: #c30;">hablo. 14:38, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:48, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * News and notes: WikiReader, Meetup in Pakistan, Audit committee elections, and more
 * In the news: Sanger controversy reignited, Limbaugh libelled, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Question about Airlines and destinations box on airport articles
Dear Trevor, I've been trying to do some clean-up and updates on articles about Brazilian airports. My question pertains airlines that operate non-regular flights (usually charter flights), which can be seasonal or year-round. For instance Arkefly operates AMS/FOR year round but it is a charter operation: no FOR/AMS/FOR tickets can be sold. Finnair operates HEL/FOR/HEL a few months a year and alike tickets can be sold only as HEL/FOR/HEL. Should those airlines be listed? What about the case of Euro Atlantic? You will see its aircraft in FOR but Euro Atlantic never markets them, only operates the flight. Thanks. (Brunoptsem (talk) 22:39, 21 October 2009 (UTC))

Aces list up for Featured List
(Posted here as well as on Georgejdorner's talk page, for clarity's sake).

I put World War I aces credited with more than 20 victories. Hopefully it will pass, but I did it mostly to get outside feedback on how we've done. If you want you can check out comments at Featured list candidates/List of World War I aces credited with more than 20 victories/archive1. Thanks for all your work on these lists. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 05:09, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

I have never mentioned this, but most of our lead material is still unreferenced. I have been tacking on citations whenever I run across an appropriate source, but we inherited some of that copy uncited. Some of the rest I know from my general reading in years past, pre-Wikipedia, but lack any recall of where I read it.

We are going to get clobbered.

Georgejdorner (talk) 06:02, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Trevor,

The Air Efficiency Award was founded in 1942. It has to be deleted from the decorations table.

Also, mention of Nazi organizations in the description of the German Wound Badge is also obviously in error.

Finally, I can't believe there are still so many aces on the table who lack even a stub, much less an article.

Georgejdorner (talk) 03:32, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Trevor,

That is a very adept rewrite. Congratulations.

Perhaps we should consider improving the Flying aces article, though.

Georgejdorner (talk) 19:36, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

79.x troll
Hi. Thanks for reverting the recent edits to my page. FYI, the individual in question is community banned User:Light current. He will stalk you for a while before moving on to the next admin who blocks him (semi-protection should help in the meantime, if you tire of reverting him). Rockpock e  t  21:58, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Request for clarification in listing
Trevor,

On the list of World War I aces credited with 7 victories, I listed Charles Chapman as Charles Chapman. It seems there is already an orphaned article about him under his full name, Charles Meredith Bouverie Chapman. I cannot seem to make the connection between orphaned article and list. Could you please help rescue this poor orphan?

BTW, I do believe my form of his name is the most common; I cannot imagine anyone going through life being referred by that mouthful. Georgejdorner (talk) 03:39, 26 October 2009 (UTC)


 * No problem. Since Charles Chapman (aviator) doesn't exist yet, you can just use the move tab to move Charles Meredith Bouverie Chapman there, then change any links (i.e. the disambig page) to point there. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 03:43, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

I did try that, but did not succeed. Wikipedia informed me there was already an existing article.

Georgejdorner (talk) 05:41, 26 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Ok, I'll try. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 12:45, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:55, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Interview: Interview with John Blossom
 * News and notes: New hires, German Wikipedian dies, new book tool, and more
 * In the news: Editor profiled in Washington Post, Wikia magazines, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Reassessment
Trevor, I don't think that you noticed that my Charomskiy M-40 article had been reassessed from C to B-class when you totaled everything up on my submissions page.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:37, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

An acknowledgment of your appreciation
I think it was pretty classy of you to acknowledge me upon submission for Featured List. I am also appreciative of your comments on my stub creation. However, I have fallen back on Stub Creation because I am tired of dealing with a dysfunctional assessment department. With about 90% of all the articles in Wikipedia completely unsourced, they are coming all unglued about the plainness of my citations. The effect is to effectively drive me into the realm of creating non-cited articles. In fact, the box atop my Talk page pretty well outlines my case.

Georgejdorner (talk) 06:04, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

WWI Aces
Hello and good afternoon. Your name was brought up on the talk page of Henry_Dolan discussing notability of military ace pilots and whether or not they have enough coverage for stand alone articles. Your input would be greatly appreciated.--TParis00ap (talk) 18:46, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:14, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Propellers in template
I've had a test of the prop issue in the sandbox though limiting it to the metric only for the moment. And from my testing it seems to be able to display props such that
 * 1) if there's a description of the prop then that is shown. If there isn't nothing shows - but a rough description of the airscrew (eg "wooden" or "two bladed") is probably the most available of the prop parameters
 * 2) if the number of engines is given, then that is shown "x per engine"
 * 3) if the diameter of the prop is given then that is shown "xxx m diameter)

The order in the template can be swapped - it would work as "1.7 m (n ft m in) diameter wooden RAE propeller" but i think number per engine works best at end and then the |prop note can cover it for awkward cases. GraemeLeggett (talk) 13:54, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Boeing 777 FA review
Greetings, Mr. MacInnis, and thanks for all your help with WP:AVIATION related topics. As someone who helped with Boeing 777's prior A-Class review, I thought you might be interested in adding comments, or if deemed worthy, support, to the article's FA review page. If you're not too busy, any contribution, however small, would be appreciated. SynergyStar (talk) 19:52, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Please, help!
Hi! I need your help. I had a dispute and tried to find a consensus with User:Jasepl (if Azerbaijan, Georgia and Armenia are in Asia or in Europe: he insisted om placing them in Europe inspite of the fact that they are geographically in Asia), but unfortunately without any results. Now he is trying to offense me using my nationality and my country:. It is already discrimintion. Please, tell me how I can influence on him using Wiki methods. --Dimitree 12:26, 4 November 2009 (UTC) --Dimitree 12:33, 4 November 2009 (UTC) --Dimitree 13:01, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

WP:WikiProject Aviation/Contest/Submissions/
Patelurology2 (talk) 03:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank for correction and linkage to participation in contest.

Harold Hartney
I created this stub, then found out that he was Canadian during WWI and became an American citizen in 1923. You may want to pick him up as part of your List of Canadian aces.

Georgejdorner (talk) 07:44, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!
As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:43, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)
The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:43, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

ACRs
Hi mate, thought I'd try and catch you since I saw you making a few edits before... MisterBee and I have had MilHist A-Class articles under Aviation ACR for a while and, despite a coo-ee on the Aviation talk page and presence on the alerts page, there's not been much interest there on what I would've thought would be almost rubber stamps. Naturally I have a vested interest in assessment occurring as far as the contest goes, preferably this month, not sure if MisterBee does as well... Makes me wonder if there's been discussion on reciprocal A-Class arrangements between MilHist and Aviation like there is between MilHist and Ships...  Basically, if a Ships article passes a MilHist ACR it automatically gets the tick for Ships as well, is it worth putting this up for consideration re. MilHist and Aviation? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:27, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for assessing the Waddy article, and also for all your hard work on the contest as a whole. Just one thing, I believe my last new article on Eric Harrison may not have been scored yet in Article Improvements (it was scored in DYK), i.e. I think my Article Improvement score is 114 for October, not 106. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 02:35, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll check it out. I archived the pages but that doesn't mean the scoring is closed. Final tally's should be up by lunch tomorrow. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 02:40, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Heh, didn't mean to hurry you along - you're doing a sterling job! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 02:43, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, and per your though above Re: ACR, I don't see a problem with rubber-stamping Aviation articles that pass a MILHIST acr. The Aviation A-class review section is underused at the moment anyways. I'll post a notice about it at WT:AVIATION and if nobody objects, I'll update the review page to mention it and reassess the applicable articles. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 00:08, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Great, it makes sense to me given the precedent with MilHist and Ships. By the way, if you see a need for an additional coordinator at Aviation, say to help out on review closures, open task announcements, Aviation Contest scoring (not my own entries of course!), etc, I have that role on MilHist and I'd be happy to do a similar task at Aviation.  I'm not sure if coords here are appointed or just volunteer, it didn't look like you hold elections as at MilHist.  Anyway, no pressure, just let me know... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:25, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:27, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

New Stan Dallas victory list
There has been some contention about the number of victories accredited to Stan Dallas; the ongoing convo can be read at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Roderic_Dallas.

I have just received, via interlibrary loan, Australian Hawk Over the Western Front. Appendix E in it lists 48 victories for Dallas. More interestingly, it does not entirely coincide with the aerodrome's listing at http://www.theaerodrome.com/aces/australi/dallas.php. Combining the two will produce a victory list somewhere in the 50s, or perhaps in the low 60s. This will be revolutionary! It would not only make him the top scoring Australian ace of World War I, but also move him well towards the top of the list for all sides in the war.

I am in the process of collating the aerodrome and Hawk lists. I am thinking that perhaps we should append a final list to the Dallas article.

I realize you are probably up to your ears in editing List of World War I aces credited with more than 20 victories, but I am soliciting your thoughts on this situation.

Georgejdorner (talk) 14:54, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Infobox Aircraft occurrence
Hi Trevor, I noticed you are changing a lot of infobox templates to 'accident', but the accident template redirects to 'occurrence'. So if you want to dab these templates, they should be changed to 'Infobox Aircraft occurrence'. Thanks, Crum375 (talk) 05:15, 14 November 2009 (UTC)