User talk:Trezatium

/Archive 1

Comment from User:24.86.210.203
I am a wikipedia neophyte. There is no question about that. I was however very concerned when I noticed that the main article didn't have much if anything to say about homosexuality and aids. Today I noticed that a user named "chicken wing" is proposing a change to the main article that would address these concerns. I also noticed that he is being taken seriously by at least 2 wikipedia pundits.

It is my contention that if people such as "chicken wing" had easy access to the Michael Fumento page they would find the task of convincing the aforementioned pundits that there is in fact ample evidence to support the notion that their is a strong correlation between homosexuality and aids. Mr Fumento has been arguing that very argument for years. Perhaps the time has come to email Mr Fumento himself and ask him to reveal his sources. But as you may know the Gay Community is often strongly at variance with any notion that might serve to undermined there agenda for more funding. 24.86.210.203 08:26, 19 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I appreciate your concerns. I have posted a reply to your comment on the AIDS talk page. It would be helpful if you would confirm whether or not you (User:24.86.210.203) are the same as User:Randy Bugger. Thanks. Trezatium 19:37, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

It was me alright but I thought that I was signed in, SORRY about that. I am a slow typer. I got an error message telling me to try logging out and signing back in. In retrospect it is probably best to bracket the subject of Aids funding and the Gay Community. I have a lot of respect for them,Randy Bugger 12:21, 20 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the clarification. No need to apologise. Trezatium 19:16, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

AIDS FUNDING CHART
Do you think that a chart and or section on aids funding since its onset is a good idea. It is pertinent to the main article and I am surprised that one does not exist already. I think it should be done with discretion. It would also help negate any reasonable objection(s) from aids dissidents. Randy Bugger 11:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I have no strong opinions on this (generally I don't do much editing to the main AIDS article). I suggest you start a discussion on the AIDS talk page. Trezatium 09:02, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

AKA Randy Bugger
Hello my real name is Moses Weintraub. The user name Randy Bugger has been put to rest due to potential breach of Wikipedias user name policy. Moses Weintraub 10:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Feedback on NPOV
Hi - just wanted to let you know that another editor, on Duesberg hypothesis, criticized the article because the article merely contains an "abundance of references to how other people think it's wrong" (rather than my personal refutation). I can't think of a better (albeit inadvertent) endorsement of its progress toward satisfying WP:NPOV, so thought I'd share it. MastCell Talk 18:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I've added a comment to the discussion. Trezatium 09:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

FLRC listing
I've listed Featured_list_removal_candidates. TONY  (talk)  15:17, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

List of HIV-positive people
Hi, I updated my sandbox list of people who could be added to the list. See User:Garion96/Sandbox2. If you ever feel bored.... :) Garion96 (talk) 09:22, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * That's for sure, there really were a lot of already done entries on that page. No idea why I did not noticed that before. The list is cleaned up now. Garion96 (talk) 13:54, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi
Nice to see you editing. Hope things are well. MastCell Talk 00:57, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

New section
Please explain what the inclusion of a funding "chart" has to do with an objective reassessment of "HIV" as the causative agent of Aids. If anything it will support dissidents. The "HIV" industry is a capitalist enterprise which funds monopoly pharmaceuticals and their public relations bodies of State Monopoly Capitalism the CDC, NIH and WHO which are all capitalist institutions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.183.185.133 (talk)
 * Just wanted to say that it's nice to see you're still editing. You were always a pleasure to interact with, and I hope things are going well. As you can see from this thread, nothing much has changed, so I hope you still have your tinfoil hat laying around... :) MastCell Talk 01:26, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:John Bamborough.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:John Bamborough.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 31 July 2019 (UTC)