User talk:Triast

Ansarada
It's not a question of notability, the article was highly promotional in tone, and, like similar articles, ignored boring stuff such as locations, profits, turnover and number of employees in favour of promoting its products. There was, of course, an awards section, but obviously no criticism. Most of the text was either unsourced or referenced only to the company website.

If it is recreated, it needs independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. It also needs a neutral, encyclopaedic and comprehensive style Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:56, 1 October 2014 (UTC)