User talk:Tribalsongs

The links you've been adding to literature articles seem to be essentially promotional to me. Wikipedia policy does not allow promotional links.

Links to this site are not very useful, because due to what seems to be a deliberately awkward navigation system, it doesn't really deliver what it promises. For example, the Lear link promises "232 poems," but displays the titles of only ten at a time (and interrupts them with advertising). This makes them relatively much less useful to readers. It is not possible, as far as I can tell, to get a single list of the Lear poems that are contained, or get to a particular poem, such as "There was a young lady, whose nose/Continually prospers and grows" without clicking painfully through many links.

I haven't checked, but I suspect that the content of this site is derived from some sources like Poet's Corner or Project Gutenberg, which delivers similar content in a far more useful way.

Accordingly, I've removed the Sanjeev.net links.

If Sanjeev.net were to be reengineered so that it provided a straightforward, useful reference source, and the links provided were to content not available without advertising from other sites, links to Sanjeev.net could be useful.

Please do not add further links to this site as long as it remains in its present form. Dpbsmith (talk) 20:04, 5 November 2005 (UTC)