User talk:Tribhuwan

Welcome and India related links
Hi! welcome to Wikipedia!

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:


 * Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try How to edit a page.
 * To sign your posts (on talk pages, Articles for deletion page etc.) use 	 ~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type (3 tildes).
 * You can experiment in the test area.
 * You can get help at the Help Desk
 * Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Five pillars, Neutral point of view, Civility, What Wikipedia is not, How to write a great article

Please use edit summaries and Show preview button more often. Welcome!! -- Gurubrahma 18:50, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Musk.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Musk.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use or fairuse. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. -- SoothingR(pour) 10:47, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Nandk.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nandk.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 06:55, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Kandalifestival.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kandalifestival.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 01:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:DSC00283.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:DSC00283.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 17:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Sumaries
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing. --Mel Etitis ( Talk ) 17:54, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Panchchuli
Hi Tribhuwan--thanks for your contributions to Panchchuli. You'll notice I put in a slightly updated set of coordinates for PC II. Do you have a reference that you can cite for the first ascent and coordinate information in the body of the article? That would be great. Thanks -- Spireguy 19:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Various suggestions
Hi Tribhuwan---Thanks again for your energy and your contributions regarding the peaks of Uttarakhand. We obviously share some interests, and I look forward to more input from you. However I have a few suggestions/requests. First, I wonder if you were planning to write articles for all of the peaks in the list Himalayan Peaks of Uttarakhand. I would advise against it, as these peaks are not all notable enough to merit separate articles. At most, some of these would merit inclusion in a merged article of the one you started for Arwa Group Of Himalayan Peaks. I just don't want you to do a lot of work that might end up deleted for lack of notability.

Also, could you please use edit summaries more consistently? It would be most helpful, and it is considered bad form not to use them. Thanks -- Spireguy 19:43, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Hello again. I wanted to add to the response I gave at Talk:Himalayan Peaks of Uttarakhand, which you should probably read before reading this. First, I wanted to clarify once more what I think could be the issues with that list of peaks. All of this, of course, is my opinion, which you are free to disregard. Some of the peaks on the list are highly famous, and certainly merit separate articles; e.g. Thalay Sagar. Some of them are not so famous, but probably merit separate articles. Some of them (e.g. most of the ones with a number after the name, and most of the "(Peak Name) North West" type), should probably be grouped together, as we have discussed. As these are all named 6,000 metre+ peaks, and since you have sources for them, they probably all merit mention of some kind, at least on a group page. It seems that at this point you are working with that kind of goal in mind, which means we may be in rough agreement.

However, as I mentioned on the talk page, the kind of list you have created can make other editors react negatively, perceiving it as a raw list, with no claim to notability. The fact that it is a large list with mostly redlinks (so far) is the main reason it would stand out. It might be better to only add peaks to the list when you have created articles for them, so that it is not so overwhelmingly red. I don't know if anyone will come along with that attitude, but if they do, they may drastically edit your list in their own way (or even delete it), which I'm sure wouldn't be pleasant. (But some other lists much like yours have stood for a long time, so it may not be a worry.)

As I said, these are all just suggestions; I'm not trying to tell you what to do.

I want to make a more general comment as well. Since we do share some interests, we have been editing the same pages quite a bit lately. I have valued your contributions and your energy, as I have said, and I want our relationship to be collaborative, not competitive or combative. I know from experience that when another editor starts actively editing pages that I have created or have an attachment to, it can feel a little hostile. That is of course not my intention. If we keep up a cordial dialogue about our mutual interests, then I think we can stay in a collaborative mode, which I look forward to. -- Spireguy 02:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Reply
Dear,Spireguy Thanks for all above.I am very sorry for writing all that absurd to you! ,I misunderstood you a bit.I do believe in creating some kind of nucleus of knowledge to let it grow.I am of the firm believer that it should be spread,shared and mutually enriched.I will definitely follow and regard your mature and valuable suggestions .Here I am removing all the peaks ,whose pages are yet not ready.You please help me in adding extra bit of knowledge to it.I am really happy that mature persons like you are in the world.Thanks.Tribhuwan 03:02, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:DSC00297.JPG
Hello, please add a note to the image description page where this place/mountain can be found. Without that, the image is not useful for any article. Thank you in advance. --GeorgHH (talk) 17:51, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rung Bhung Chim


The article Rung Bhung Chim has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced claims about a bygone social custom in one geographic location. Presently does not satisfy notability or verifiability. Tagged as unreferenced since December 2006. Found no refs for it at Google Book Search or Google Scholar.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Edison (talk) 22:43, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Munsiyari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sub Division (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kanalichhina


The article Kanalichhina has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not meet WP:GNG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 04:57, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

"Jonglingkong or Baba Kailashor Chhota Kailash" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Jonglingkong or Baba Kailashor Chhota Kailash and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 08:11, 2 February 2022 (UTC)