User talk:Tricana8571uno

Welcome!
Hello, Tricana8571uno, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Sport in India. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Razer ( talk ) 06:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks Tricana8571uno (talk) 07:59, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

JEE Advanced Qualification Rate
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joint_Entrance_Examination_%E2%80%93_Advanced&oldid=prev&diff=1101338895

"29.54% out of which who were only eligible to write JEE Advanced"

The language used here is pretty vague. Can you define what does qualification rate means? I mean does it includes just only IIT's or other colleges like NIT's GFIT's and IIIT's because technically you can take admission in these colleges even after being above cut-off.

In my opinion it would be better to add data for individual categories for better clarification. Srijan Suryansh (talk) 14:00, 31 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Hey Srijan, I want only to give actual information provided by the exam administrator itself(IIT) for being authentic.
 * https://www.iaspaper.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/JEE-Advanced-2021-Result-Press-Release.pdf
 * They said in their press release that out of 141699 appeared, 41862 qualified. That's what qualification means isn't it. I did little data look in JEE report and look like they provide relaxation to some category of students in passing marks but still they are qualified and part of total number of applicants. They are not second class applicants so you can't ignore them in data.
 * One thing you can do is please mention how many students qualified under relaxation, namely 10% for GEN-EWS/OBC-NCL, 50% for SC/ST/PWD and 75% for SC/ST/PWD preparatory courses. Since they count these applicants also in the qualified category. But they didn't have the date of 2021 report, so can paste 2020 data or wait.
 * But qualification rate should remain 29%, what it is. Thanks Tricana8571uno (talk) 14:44, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Ok i get it now but still it would better if we add category wise qualification Srijan Suryansh (talk) 03:23, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Dear User:Tricana8571uno, As a new editor at Wikipedia, I would like to take a moment to express my gratitude for your contributions to the pages on "Joint Entrance Examination - Main","Joint Entrance Examination - Advanced" and "Ministry of Defence (India)" Your expertise and attention to detail have been invaluable in improving the quality and accuracy of these pages.

for your continued dedication to the Wikipedia community.

- Best regards, Macrobreed2 (talk) 05:42, 15 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for appreciation Tricana8571uno (talk) 05:53, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

requesting inputs
@Tricana8571uno you seem to have contributed in law related topics. You can share inputs @ WT:MOS/LEGAL#Attention to updating of MOS guidelines if topic interests you.

Happy editing &#32;Bookku   (talk) 08:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

New message from AP 499D25
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:7 nm process § Intel 7. &#x0020;Hi, I've noticed you changed the 'Intel 7' link on Raptor Lake from 7nm to 10nm, and the 'Intel 4' link on Meteor Lake from 5nm to 7nm, I just wanted to let you know that this has been discussed thoroughly over at the 7nm process talk page and that there is a rough consensus that Intel 7 should be called 7nm and vice versa. If you disagree, feel free to leave a comment there! Thanks! — AP 499D25  (talk)  12:33, 13 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks Andrew, I didn't knew about discussion on this; still I think Intel is just doing a marketing gimmick by rebranding 10nm to 7; but since if there is a large consensus for Intel 7 as a 7nm process, i am reverting my edit Tricana8571uno (talk) 12:51, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Tbh I wasn't really requesting a revert, just letting you know about the discussion that's been had in the past about this.
 * Since the thread is quite long, I'll give a tl;dr on the matter: 7nm, 10nm, 14nm, these node names are actually all just marketing names; there's nothing about these nodes that are physically 7, 10 nanometres in size or whatever. Since the late 1990s, chip fabs have been increasing transistor density through other means than just linear gate size decreases. So there isn't really a strong point in calling Intel 7 a 10nm node, actually, as there is still nothing about it that is actually 10 nanometres in size. We call nodes from other foundries by what they themselves refer it to as (e.g. 3nm for Samsung "3nm", even though its density is closer to that of 5nm nodes from competing foundries), so might as well call Intel 7 a 7nm node. — AP 499D25  (talk)  12:43, 20 July 2024 (UTC)