User talk:Trickstercard101

Welcome!
Hello, Trickstercard101, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Christina Grimmie has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. — ATS &#128406;  Talk  00:51, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

"On 06/11/16, Detective Ferrara and I attended the autopsy of Christina Grimmie, which was performed by Dr. Joshua Stephany. Christina suffered a gunshot wound to the side of her head. The entrance wound had stippling surrounding it, which indicates the bullet was fired in close range of the victim. This wound was fatal. Christina also suffered three gunshot wounds to her torso. Dr. Stephany determined Christina died of multiple gunshot wounds and her manner of death was homicide...."
 * From Grimmie Investigative Supplement, p.6:

In addition, the Daily Mail is considered dubious as a reliable source. Please use care when citing the Daily Mail, and only for data that can be verified elsewhere. Thank you. — ATS &#128406;  Talk  01:00, 2 September 2016 (UTC)