User talk:Trillo255

Articles for deletion/FC Mojo (2nd nomination)
Normally, in a deletion discussion, we leave one comment, in which we explain the Wikipedia rules and outside sources that support either deleting or keeping an article. After that, we generally assume that our position has been fully stated, and only respond if we discover more information, or if later people's reasons cause us to change our minds. It isn't necessary or useful to repeatedly state the same points, since they're still on the page. In response to your question: yes, someone who appears to have joined Wikipedia only to participate in a deletion discussion, in general, is a person who isn't interested in what's good for Wikipedia, but in what's good for whatever the subject under discussion is- they are often not familiar with Wikipedia's rules for inclusion, and so, when the discussion is evaluated, the reviewing administrator will generally ignore anything they say that doesn't reflect an understanding of the rules for inclusion- especially if their tone is not polite. Most of the people in the discussion have no familiarity with the subject, and are making their decision in a neutral way based solely on the rules and the available sources- one place that new users like yourself can be useful is in drawing attention to reliable sources that other users may have missed. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:14, 21 April 2010 (UTC)