User talk:Trimbitrima

WP:CSD
You have tagged mutiple articles with an A9. None of them meets the two criteria of A9, one of which requires that the artist not have a Wikipedia article on the artist. This is a warning that your tagging is disruptive and if you continue, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:29, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I apologize, won't happen again. --Trimbitrima (talk) 12:23, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Women of Krusha e Madhe. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ''' Flat Out   let's discuss it   12:28, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I stand by my edit. Whoever places that tag is supposed to start a discussion in the talk page. Since there is no discussion started, then the tag is superfluous. --Trimbitrima (talk) 12:32, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I didn/t place the tag, I reinstated it because you removed it because the article passed at AfD which is unrelated. If you are going to remove you need to ensure the issue has been resolved. ''' Flat Out   let's discuss it   12:43, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * No, I don't need to do anything. Whoever thinks the article is POV, is supposed to start a discussion. I don't know why the article should be labeled, it's the person who places the tag that is supposed to explain that in the talk page of the article. --Trimbitrima (talk) 12:44, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Correct, it is the person who places the tag who should make it clear in either an edit summary or on the talk page as to why there is an issue. It is the role of the person removing it (you) to give a valid reason for doing so. ''' Flat Out   let's discuss it   12:51, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * What reason did this person give? I'm not going to clutter the talk page, because someone doesn't know how to use wikipedia. --Trimbitrima (talk) 13:01, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * You would have to ask that editor. ''' Flat Out   let's discuss it   13:25, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * No, I don't have to. It would be nice, but I don't have the time. And I don't have to. If you find me a policy that says I have to, I will. Good luck! --Trimbitrima (talk) 13:29, 6 April 2014 (UTC)