User talk:TriniPapi/Important marine mammal area/Michael Recycle Peer Review

Very good work! A lot of information synthesis went into this article and it shows. Your article is structured in a way that makes sense, and it's language is friendly enough to invite a second (or third) read, as several acronyms introduced all at once can be quite confusing. Perhaps introduce MPA in the lead so that its presence in the subsequent section isn't surprising, or flows better (just a very minor suggestion!)

Neutrality is not an issue for you. You introduce the framework(s) and the criteria by which they are applied. The reference links I tried (reference 2, 7, & 13) all worked.

--Michael Recycle (talk) 19:42, 22 April 2021 (UTC)