User talk:TriodeFollower

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Dominik Richert, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:58, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.


 * Greetings, I see you're working to improve the sourcing; great to see! I'd strongly suggest you check out GoogleBooks (you can generally see segments of many books for free), and search his name there. I'm seeing a lot of good academic literature discussing him. Note also that you can automatically turn gBooks URLs (the bit in your address bar at top) into fullly-formatted Wikipedia footnotes using http://reftags.appspot.com . Hope this helps! MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Dang, there are like 1,400+ hits for his name on GoogleBooks; you really want to get over there and pull some footnotes to substantiate the article. This will turn out to be quite easy for you, not like the Sourcing struggle others have with more obscure topics. MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:23, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of David Sutherland (headmaster) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Sutherland (headmaster) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/David Sutherland (headmaster) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 06:13, 28 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Strongly opposed deletion. Said so in the discussion. --Dthomsen8 (talk) 20:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

The Journalists (1852 play) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, The Journalists (1852 play), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Journalists (1852 play) has been accepted
 The Journalists (1852 play), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=The_Journalists_(1852_play) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing!  Onel 5969  TT me 15:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Cameronians (Scottish Rifles)
Hi - Please can you format the reference for the extra material you have just added to Cameronians (Scottish Rifles). At the moment it just cites the British Newspaper Archive (which many readers will not be registered with): it could do with being expanded to include the article title, newspaper name and date (see WP:CITE). Thanks, Dormskirk (talk) 18:07, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I have now cited the comment properly using the Herald Scotland. Dormskirk (talk) 23:13, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your helpful advice. I have changed the reference as you suggested, and included your one as well. In view of the content of the original article I have changed the wording back to not refer to the burgermeister - I think the story was probably exaggerated in the telling. TriodeFollower (talk) 14:43, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Non-uniform memory access, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ICL.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

H. H. Martyn moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, H. H. Martyn, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 07:48, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: H. H. Martyn (October 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:H. H. Martyn may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:TriodeFollower Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rich_Smith&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:TriodeFollower reviewer's talk page] . or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail 14:16, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello TriodeFollower! Your additions to Draft:H. H. Martyn have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:33, 30 October 2023 (UTC)


 * When I made this submission, I was simply trying to provide some basic information about the company and sought the permission of Gloucestershire Archives to use their account - which is what I then did. I have since approached the task much more thoroughly - and found out a great deal more about the subject than I previously did! The new version is written by me. Sorry for any inconvenience caused. TriodeFollower (talk) 15:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Limpsfield
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Limpsfield, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20TriodeFollower&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1191469295 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:34, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Limpsfield&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1191469295%7CLimpsfield%5D%5D Ask for help])


 * fixed TriodeFollower (talk) 15:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
Thanks for contributing to the article Furness Withy. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 13:52, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * References provided TriodeFollower (talk) 18:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philipp Etter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Max Huber.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)


 * fixed TriodeFollower (talk) 15:36, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hohenlychen Sanatorium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fritz Fischer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 23 February 2024 (UTC)


 * fixed TriodeFollower (talk) 16:48, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Robert Lindsey Clark (sculptor)


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Robert Lindsey Clark (sculptor). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Robert Lindsey Clark. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Robert Lindsey Clark. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. — Moriwen (talk) 18:13, 28 February 2024 (UTC)