User talk:Tripbeetle

Hello
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for writing the article Japanvisitor. Unfortunately, it doesn't conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, and has, as a result, been marked for deletion. However, please do not be disheartened by what may or may not happen to your first article, if indeed it is deleted - please continue to edit Wikipedia and add articles which conform with the inclusion criteria. For help, see Help:Contents. To find out what will probably be deleted, see Criteria for speedy deletion and What Wikipedia is not. Thanks, and if you have any questions, please ask them on my user talk page. To do this, click on my name (just after this sentence) and click discussion at the top and then the (+) button at the top. Tikiwont 10:07, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Three revert rule
Friendly advice: If you violate the WP:3RR three revert rule, administrators may block you for up to 24 hours. You reverted to a statement that Larry Craig was a non-flusher at 02:28, 25 September 2007, at 14:41, 25 September 2007 , at  00:45, 26 September 2007. Give it a rest. There is no consensus that every flushing or non-flushing of a toilet is encyclopedic, or that every detail in every arrest report about a notable person needs to be included in the person's article. Edison 05:07, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Friendly retort
Friendly advice: If you violate the WP:3RR three revert rule, administrators may block you for up to 24 hours. You reverted to a statement that Larry Craig was a non-flusher at 02:28, 25 September 2007 [1], at 14:41, 25 September 2007 [2], at 00:45, 26 September 2007 [3]. Give it a rest. There is no consensus that every flushing or non-flushing of a toilet is encyclopedic, or that every detail in every arrest report about a notable person needs to be included in the person's article. Edison 05:07, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tripbeetle"

"There is no consensus that every flushing or non-flushing of a toilet is encyclopedic, or that every detail in every arrest report about a notable person needs to be included in the person's article."

Edison, your statement is problematic in several ways. 1. The flushing or non-flushing of a toilet is by no means encyclopedic when performed by an ordinary person such as you or me when we've actually used the toilet. However - and this is a very big however - (and I'm not really sure why it's necessary for me to have to spell this out to you) when no one less than a senator of the United States purports to have been using a public toilet for its rightful purpose but by failing to flush makes it manifestly obvious that he did NOT use it for its rightful purpose, but, rather, for the act, to which he originally pleaded guilty, i.e., of being a public nuisance, then the act of not flushing could hardly be more significant. 2. Of course not "every detail in every arrest report about a notable person needs to be included in the person's article". But as I have just made clear above, this is by no means a minor detail. It is a major detail. 3. Are you going to explain to me your real reason for tirelessly trying to eliminate this piece of information from the Larry Craig article? Because I'm going to be straight up with you and give you my reason. I am a gay man, a male homosexual, and, very unlike Larry Craig, I readily affirm my sexual orientation and defend its legitimacy. I am therefore all the more disappointed by Larry Craig's hyprocrisy. The fact that he did not flush the toilet is, in my mind, even more damning a confirmation of the legitimacy of the police officer's interpretation of Craig's "foot tapping" and "hand running" (i.e. as an invitation to engage in sex) than anything else. I will repeat: The fact that he did not flush the toilet says that he was not in there to use the toilet. That, in the light of his foot-tapping, his hand-running, his peering through the door, his using a stall right next to the police officer's when there were several others unoccupied, etc., proclaims the nature of his intentions loud and clear. I have an interest in the truth of this case, and I believe that, in the context of this case, the act of not flushing the toilet was very pertinent. Whether you appreciate my motives for trying to bring home to readers the truth of this case or not, the truth is the truth, and the truth - which I believe has nothing to do with Craig's public pronouncments after his arrest came to light - is what I am trying to underscore. Now that I have explained my reason for my dedicated efforts to include this significant piece of information, I would appreciate your enlightening me as to what must be your equally strongly felt motives for concealing this signficant piece of information. 4. Finally, for now, threatening me with 24 hours suspension for insisting on adding a detail that I believe is of major significance is rather authoritarian, don't you think? It certainly doesn't square with your professed distaste for government interference in people's lives when you are effectively trying to force your way of seeing things on me without any prior debate on the matter. Your threat is in no way ameliorated by your labelling it "friendly advice," either. To me it sounds more like "stop it, or else!".

Looking forward to hearing back from you. tripbeetle


 * I did not intend to make a threat and that is why I prefaced it as "friendly advice." In fact your reverts are spread out so that you were not on the verge of a technical 3RR, and I hoped you would not be tempted to place yourself in that situation. Sub-3RR reverting, if carried out long enough, is also frowned on by some admins, see example Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive301# in section 14 Press up. The better approach is to fight the battle in the talk page, and to find third party comments in a reliable source (such as an editorial in a major publication) where the nonflush is seen as proof of something. I have found countless non-flushed toilets, and took it as proof only that the previous user was inconsiderate. If he in fact left a pristine toilet behind, it only might prove he left before doing his excretory business. The tapping, foot contact, and sub-partition gestures have been discussed in third party sources and called incriminating. Take a look at The Smoking Gun [4] and the arrest report for several randomly chosen celebrities. How many details do you see there that are not included in their Wikipedia articles, even though some Wikipedia editor might personally feel it proves something? You see it as me forcing my views on you, but at the same time you stated above that you wish to have the Craig article express your views and values. Please try to gain a connsensus with other editors who are following the article. Others apparently just do not share your view that it is an important enough fact to include in the article.Other than the revert and the message on your talk page, I do not recall much involvement in the editing of this "nonflush" aspect of the Craig matter. Edison 19:51, 26 September 2007 (UTC) of 3 for a 24 hour period, and a fourth one will, unfortunately, result in a 24 hour block per WP:3RR. Please seek sources to show the reelevance of the detail and get some buy-in on the article disussion [age rather than edit-warring by simply reverting. Edison 20:09, 26 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Your latest reversion has placed you at a total of 3 within a 24 hour period, and a fourth one will, unfortunately, result in a 24 hour block per WP:3RR. Please seek sources to show the relevance of the detail and get some buy-in on the article disussion page rather than edit-warring by simply reverting. Edison 20:09, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Collagen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Denaturation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=723283343 your edit] to Takenaka Corporation may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:30, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Takenaka Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minato ward. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Takenaka Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minato ward. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nobuhisa Sagawa (June 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nobuhisa Sagawa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nobuhisa Sagawa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Nobuhisa_Sagawa Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KJP1&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Nobuhisa_Sagawa reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 05:47, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Mitsuhiko Fujii
Hi, nice to meet you, I'm Hatto0467.

Thank you for editting Mio Sugita article!

If you are no problem, I'd like to request you to expand right-wing activist Mitsuhiko Fujii article.

It was reported that Fujii kicked the Comfort Women statue in Tainan City, Taiwan in September 2018.

He is a man who come together with Mio Sugita. (Fujii and Sugita's picture. Please see https://twitter.com/miosugita/status/873119203783434242 )

Would you join editting his article?

Hi Hatto0467. Thank you for your message, and I'm sorry for the very late reply.

I notice that the Mitsuhiko Fujii article you referred to is no longer up.

--tripbeetle (talk) 13:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)