User talk:TripleH1976/Archive1

Archived Talk

 * Archive 1

Macaulay Culkin
Howdy! In response to your comment on my user page, I'd like to guide you to the terms under which fair use promotional photos are usable: Promophoto. As you can see, one of the primary requirements is that they can only be used in the absence of a free alternative. While I admit the mugshot isn't the most flattering picture of him, it's relatively high quality and definitely available under a free license. As such, there's not much of a rationale for replacing it with a fair sue image. However, I've noted that you removed both images from the page, which is an acceptable compromise. It's a shame the guy isn't attending that many movie premieres nowadays, or there'd be a chance to obtain a free licence image acceptable to both of us. Anyways, Happy editing! GeeJo (t)⁄(c) &bull; 19:52, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Everybody Hates Chris
don't remove important character information as pages are to explain the personality of the characters. You probably shouldn't even change any of the wording on the page describing the characters as it was strongly accurate. If you continue to vandalize pages and taken upon yourself to get rid of accurate information, I will take further action against you. No wikivandalizers will be allowed on this site.

What did I tell you? What did I tell you? I told you not to remove that. Get it through your thick skull please before there's mess

Leave it alone. you're a troublemaker

I'm gay for men who resist me like you have been doing with this article. I find it hot. I'm turning it back Tonetare 21:44, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Dude, why do you keep changing the page. it's fine 65.31.100.170 22:12, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

The page needs those descriptions man. Tonetare 22:17, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Jeremy Strohmeyer
I just thought the rhetoric of the article sounded like it was written by a victim. I'll remove POV, it does seem like I was a tad sensitive. Looking back, I agree with you.

TWA Flight 800
Sure! Wikipedia is a popular website; it seems as though someone from the government who knows enough about this could easily come here and fix up the page to everyone's liking and cite sources (although it hasn't happened yet...) I am certainly no expert &mdash; I simply tagged this because it seems clear to me from the discussion that it needs help. Grand master  ka  05:04, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ngfinal.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ngfinal.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 16:06, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Rudolph
Take your politics and religion elsewhere, and keep them off my talk page. Bombing is a cowardly act, end of story. Search 4  Lancer  05:41, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Huh?
What is your obsession with the word "murder"? "Kill" is a much more forceful word in this context. --Dhartung | Talk 18:57, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Incidentally, an edit summary of "rvv" is short for "revert vandalism". --Dhartung | Talk 00:49, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Nancy Grace
I just deleted half the article (all WP:NPOV ramblings and rhetorical strategies to lead towards Nancy Grace hatred). If you see anymore, please tell me, and I'll try to either tone it down or delete that which may be of no other relevance other than to serve as an attempt at shredding Grace apart. Michael 20:42, 4 August 2006 (UTC)


 * All right - that's cool. I've had this article on my watchlist for a while now.  People frequently change it.  TripleH1976 13:44 p.m., 4 August 2006 (UTC)

I know. It's a frequent site of vandalism. Michael 20:52, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

A smile for you...


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! Michael 22:30, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Runway incursion between US Airways flight 1170 and Aer Lingus flight 132‎
We seem to have reached a disagreement over the noteability of the above article. According to site policy, the thing to be done with a contested prod is to remove the prod, and replace it with an AfD nomination. Since the nominator should be a person who believes it should be deleted, that falls to you to create. Hopefully we can resolve this through AfD. - Blood red sandman 18:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

The text you were using on the AfD template is reserved for articles that have been listed at AfD before - I apreciate this is poorly explained on the page saying how to list for deletion. I have corrected the template, but you still need to go to the red link on the template, and put this text on it:

Runway incursion between US Airways flight 1170 and Aer Lingus flight 132‎
Entirely frivolous in my opinion - nothing noteable happened.

You should then sign the text. I am able to carry out anything else that needs done to sort out the nomination correctly. Thanks, Blood red sandman 19:16, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

The text is not displaying corectly on your talk page. you will have to see here for it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion

In fact, I'll tell you what - to save the confusion, I'll do it myself, and state it was on your behalf if you would find that easier. Simply say so on my talk page and I'll do it - Blood red sandman 19:22, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

I clearly know more about Eric Rudolph than you12.226.237.65 12:13, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Edited my previous entry.. I was a little rude, sorry Lordkazan 12:43, 30 August 2006 (UTC)