User talk:TripleShotEspresso

Bigender article
Regarding this edit you made, you might want to respond at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. A WP:Permalink for that section is here.
 * Thanks! TripleShotEspresso (talk) 01:41, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

And specifically regarding your edits: Besides needing the type of sources approved by WP:MEDRS for the content you are adding, you should follow MOS:HEAD (sentence case, not title case), and you should not use Wikipedia articles as sources. See WP:Reliable sources. Flyer22 (talk) 04:52, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I was more trying to link people to further resources on the topics than I was trying to use Wikipedia pages as sources. Is there a more appropriate way to go about that? The pages I linked to are not solely related to the words I tagged, but they contain a more in depth resource for those topics. TripleShotEspresso (talk) 01:41, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

The Harvard University Press source is fine, as long as you did not use it to engage in WP:Synthesis. WP:Synthesis is a no-go. Flyer22 (talk) 04:58, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I did not, so we're all good. It's an excellent book, by the way, if you're interested in critiques of sex and gender research.TripleShotEspresso (talk) 01:41, 28 April 2015 (UTC)