User talk:Triplemayo

August 2017
Wikipedia works by consensus and collaboration. When a discussion has resulted in a decision to delete an article, as happened with Zach Allia, it is not considered helpful for an individual editor to try to unilaterally overturn that decision by re-creating the same article, ignoring the outcome of the discussion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:17, 9 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The reasons for deletion were a total power trip and a matter of opinion that the person (me) in the article was a "unremarkable early stage entrepreneur." Despite having many large publications (many which aren't even listed because I DIDNT CREATE THE PAGE OR EDIT IT). The article is relevant, important, and factual. It is not a resume as I don't even continue to do tech and am now an artist verified (blue check) on facebook and twitter with hundreds of thousands of followers. Triplemayo (talk) 20:32, 9 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Can you please respond? Triplemayo (talk) 16:26, 10 August 2017 (UTC)


 * I am not sure what you want me to respond to. I see that you think you are impressive, that the article about you was "important", and that you think that having a large number of "followers" on Twitter should become part of Wikipedia's notability standards. I don't really have anything to say about any of those facts. However, I do suggest that you may find it helpful to read Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines. There isn't a great deal of point in telling me why you disagree with opinions expressed by other editors, not by me. Also, one other point which I didn't think to mention when I posted here before is that you re-posted content which had previously been published in Wikipedia by other people, without giving attribution to them. That is a violation of their copyright, as Wikipedia's licensing terms require such attribution when copying content. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:39, 10 August 2017 (UTC)


 * I am not saying that I am "impressive," I am saying that the reasons for removal were that it was a PR play or resume and that is totally invalid. I don't think it is "unremarkable" to have a company that has products in Target, Bed Bath & Beyond, and raised many millions of dollars, a company that sold to Disney, a company that was "impressive" enough that Zuckerberg share it on his facebook. Additionally, having a huge following for photography online and offline on multiple platforms where they have verified me for my legitimacy. I can find you 100s of examples of less "impressive" articles on wikipedia. My sincere apologies for "copying" an article that you deleted about me. I clearly am missing something with what you and wikipedia thinks is important and I do not mean to just address this to you. To the general public wikipedia is very hard to use and I don't see a clear way to address everyone involved in this deletion.