User talk:Triplestop/Archive 3

Your support of an RfA
You appear to have voted twice for support.--Rockfang (talk) 20:30, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Ooops, that was embarrassing. I took it out Triplestop (talk) 21:07, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Cigar etiquette
I would think it could be merged and redirected to cigar. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 03:37, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * It appears to be made up, and I don't think the etiquette of cigar smoking is notable/widely accepted enough for adding to Cigar. Triplestop (talk) 17:50, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

United Nations Association of Slovenia
I am the author of the web page, where a took the text and reshaped it for Wikipedia. Know I try to learn how to prove I am the author and trying to include some basic facts about the UNA Slovenia on Wikipedia. Could you help? All the best, Boschtjan (talk) 18:50, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You need to provide external confirmation of some sort that the web page is indeed yours. Triplestop (talk) 18:51, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

I have included in the footer of the page following: "The text of this website is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License." You can have a look on www.unaslovenia.org/en. Is it OK now? Thanks. Boschtjan (talk) 19:12, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Your question
Hi, thanks for the message. Maybe not, I think. The user could be working up a legitimate article in his user space, notwithstanding that it seems to be about himself. He seems to be marginally notable, i.e. he has worked on some pretty successful TV shows and I see some hits in google news for him. I would give it the benefit of the doubt for now, keep an eye on it for a week or two, as it's not in mainspace, and see what he does with it. Cheers, --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:47, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

UAA
Then why are there no templates on the userpages? And can't these usernames be deleted from the database? --- Scarce  ||||  You shouldn't have buried me,   I'm not dead --- 15:09, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedying userspace material on content grounds
I'm not sure that it's helpful to tag userspace material as promotional. One of the purposes of user space is to allow users to work on material that is not yet in a form suitable for an article page, and we urge users to do that in several places. Since the pages are not indexed by any major search engines, users are not incentivized to create them for googlespam, and so I tend to assume good faith unless the material in question is an attack page or copyvio. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:14, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The page appears to be created by a person with the same username as the subject making it a violation of WP:SPAMNAME. Also note that G11 applies to all namespaces.  Triplestop  x3  22:18, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Your comments on the proposed topic ban of NYScholar
I don't mean for this to sound aggressive, because it's a sincere question, but how familiar are you with fair use and Wikipedia's non-free content rules? I ask because, while NYScholar's arguments may indeed be logical, they follow from some completely inaccurate first principles (i.e. blatant misconceptions about copyright law) on which he/she absolutely refuses to be corrected, even in the fact of every other editor involved in discussions disputing them. Steve Smith (talk) (formerly Sarcasticidealist) 04:10, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Please see my already-stated statements of how the "fair use rationale" for the image in question is invalid on the basis of its not meeting several of the "criteria" for "fair use" in the WP:IUP. I stated the same in Talk:Harold Pinter, but Sarcasticidealist (now going under the moniker  Steve Smith) in support of Jezhotwells and Ssilvers falsely maintains the opposite.  I have clearly questioned the validity of the latter's fair use rationale in relation to both the criteria for "fair use" and the misuse of copyright property without a valid fair use claim/rationale.  (See my own current talk page responses to Sarcasticidealist et al.) The photo adds nothing educational to the article that is not already linked in it (it is from the index page of a section of the subject's official website, which is accessible to everone in English Wikipedia).  It is not a "unique historic image"; it is posted on the website and easily viewed, and the website is copyright Harold Pinter, a copyright which is in force.  With no valid fair use rationale, how is this use permissible in Wikipedia? (Other issues pertaining to restrictions placed on the photograph by the conditions of the British Library archive exist too, but it is not true to say that I have "blatant misconceptions about copyright law on which" I "absolutely refuse...to be corrected, etc."  These editors just want to post this image whether or not it meets WP:IUP. They have no concern for actually meeting the "fair use criteria", since they have already acknowledged that it may not meet them.  So....?   --NYScholar (talk) 04:53, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I have spent the past several days involved in this whole "ban" thing; I just went back to the image page and noticed that changes were made to the fair use rationale that I had not noticed (sometime on June 23), and I've updated my comments on the discussion page. Please consult that if you wish.  Thank you.  --NYScholar (talk) 09:44, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Wolfgang Danspeckgruber
Just a friendly note, when you replace a deleted Speedy tag, please add back any maintenance tags that were added after the CSD was removed. Thanks... ttonyb1 (talk) 17:26, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Userpages

 * I realized that my username was the same as my private domain name. I requested a user name change to CardwellTax, which unfortunately is also a domain name.  Help:  how do I unrequest the name change?  I think I have one that will work:  slytax.  Thanks.Sfcardwell (talk) 01:13, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

You're doing fine at WP:UAA (though I'm not one to talk... but that's a topic for another New Section on another day), but just so you know, CSDs aren't used for user pages. - Warthog Demon  01:35, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * CSD criterion under "G" for general apply to all namespaces. See WP:CSD  Triplestop  x3  01:38, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Admin offer
Thanks for the vote of confidence, but I have made too many enemies, some of whom would start crawling out from under their rocks to oppose me. --Calton | Talk 15:33, 27 June 2009 (UTC)


 * If it were a simple majority, no problem; but it's not, it's supermajority, so it is a problem. --Calton | Talk 15:43, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

RfA Thanks
Hi Triplestop. I just wanted to thank you for contributing to my RfA. It wasn't one of the best RfA's held, but I've learned a lot from the experience. Sorry for sending you the message today, and not last week when my RfA was closed. I've been very busy the last time. Thanks once again! Kind regards,  Lourie Pieterse  10:20, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Juliancolton‎
Who said "great minds think alike"? It appears MBisanz was thinking the same thing. Plastikspork (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

db-g10
Hi Concerning your change to db-g10, the problem with adding an open-ended div to hide the content is that it only gives the appearance to be blanked, but Google will still index the page content. See WT:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 34 for an older discussion about it. Cheers, Amalthea  10:54, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Is it possible to include an html comment to blank it out instead?  Triplestop  x3  14:48, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid not, they will always either be interpreted as a wikicode comment and not make it into output, or be escaped as "&amp;lt;--". Amalthea  16:14, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Spamstar of Glory

 * Thanks very much!  Triplestop  x3  18:00, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Quick reply
Certainly it should be blacklisted. It has failed as a source at the WP:RS noticeboard. The Wiki-article for the website was also AfD'd as it was determined to be an amateur fansite run by a carpet salesman. The Real Libs-speak politely 19:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

suspension of 193.63.75.2 for spamming
May I please ask what you consider this IP was doing wrong? Specifically?PointOfPresence (talk) 23:26, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The IP was not adding "promotional links to a commercial site", but to a free, information portal on synthetic biology for scientists! The IP was in fact the Royal Society itself. Please check your facts before behaving so heavy handedly in future.PointOfPresence (talk) 23:44, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * but the link was to a free resource. Did you not check this? And are you aware that the Royal Society is a not-for-profit organisation? It is in fact the UK's National Academy of Science.PointOfPresence (talk) 23:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for the examples. I have looked at the referring wikipedia pages and it would seem that the links you refer to were made by someone at Imperial College (which shares the same IP address as the Royal SocietyPointOfPresence (talk) 00:08, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * And how is it, by the way, that you do not consider the featuring of the Mazda RX-8 on today's front page of Wikipedia spamming?PointOfPresence (talk) 08:01, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

So-called spamming by non-profits

 * And how do you explain the link to a 5 day course at MIT being added at the foot of the Synthetic Biology article? This course costs a few thousand dollars! Or is it only "spam" if it's by non-profits outside the USA?! PointOfPresence (talk) 12:06, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

user warning

 * I'm no fan of people who spam Wikipedia either, but don't you think this was a little harsh? Unless I'm missing something, this user created an article, and it was speedy deleted. Then they re-created the article as their user page, and I nommed it for speedy deletion as well. Then you came in and issued a final warning even thought there had been no previous warnings. At the least, it was technically incorrect as it should have been an "only warning" but the real issue is that you should not bite the newcomers. Misunderstandings of what Wikipedia is and how it works are extremely common with new users, that is exactly why we have several different levels of warning templates, and a final warning should only be used if there is a persistent problem after previous warnings. Thanks Beeblebrox (talk) 01:41, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Woops, I must have misread something. However, in my experience almost all users who spam do nothing but spam, and I use 4/4im warnings for blatant spamming.  Triplestop  x3  01:54, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

User:Auckland University Press
We must distinguish between a mere role account, which gets a "softblock"; and a spamusername. In the case of the above-named, it's a clear spamusername. This account has not merely edited the article about the named organization, with edits which make it clear that the account-user(s) regard him/her/themself/selves as representing the Press; in addition, the history of this account is one of creating articles about AUP authors and adding favorable content to articles about AUP authors. In more borderline cases, taking the account to COI/N may be advised instead. -- Orange Mike  |   Talk  20:03, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

User:RosaChronicles/The World of Rosa
I'm not going to delete this as spam, because it isn't really the kind of advert that the criterion was designed to stop. However, it could be nominated for WP:MFD. Stifle (talk) 20:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Template:Uw-spam1
Hi, I reverted a recent edit you made to this template. I've brought up a discussion about it at this page.  Them From  Space  02:58, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Username_policy
See particularly my offer. - Dank (push to talk) 20:56, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Recent fixes
Thanks for your fixes on my user talk page! Ottawa4ever (talk) 21:55, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

UAA and username policy update
Just letting you and other editors who do a lot of listings at UAA know that the username policy has underwent some changes as of yesterday. You may wish to look it over at your convenience. Cheers, Nja 247 09:57, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Closure
Thanks. I knew that I was probably missing something there. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:44, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Maywood Library
Hi there, I saw you tagged me for spamming. I know it probably looks like I'm trying to promote the library, but in reality, there's a real danger of losing a lot of info about the history of the library because the articles/books I'm researching through are fairly falling apart. Should I find another place/way to record the history of the library? If wiki is not appropos, do you have any suggestions? Thanks so much for looking out for the community! --Maywoodlibrary (talk) 16:14, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * If you feel the library is notable, then you could create a page on it, but you should real WP:COI  Triplestop  x3  17:51, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Trolling at RfA
I agree that this edit constituted "trolling". However it is not your place to adjust such !votes in this way. Axl ¤  [Talk]  20:46, 31 July 2009 (UTC)


 * What is the preferred way of remedying this?  Triplestop  x3  20:49, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * You'll see from my comment that the closing bureaucrat will treat Spiritual Collector's !vote with the contempt that it deserves. There's no need to strike through the !vote. Perhaps you would consider removing your strikethrough? Axl  ¤  [Talk]  20:53, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Ok.  Triplestop  x3  20:54, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. :-) Axl  ¤  [Talk]  20:55, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Blocked user, offensive user page
Hi, in the case of This user that you blocked, could you perhaps delete the talk page too?  Chzz  ►  06:19, 1 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I did not block them, I am not an admin. I just censored their talk page. The previous contents of their page was deleted previously.  Triplestop  x3  15:26, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Whew!
I just deleted all of those articles and informed the user. Those pictures he posted clearly weren't his and I called him on it. I might need to learn how to use Twinkle for massive deletions like this. Took me what felt like a week. :) Thanks for the heads-up.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:04, 2 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Ooh, nice new tool...! That one just went on my faves list.  Thanks for the link; that tool didn't exist before I'd left the project.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 06:37, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Metal-observer
This link here should help. Hu12 says clear them all out of Wiki mainspace. Forget Wikipedia pages and talk pages and page archives. Just mainspace pages for now. As long as it was used falsely reference an "idea"... then leave behind the text along with a {cn} tag. But if it seems to be quoting something directly (like one of their amateur hack reviews) then remove the quoted bit as well. Hope that helps. The Real Libs-speak politely 19:34, 2 August 2009 (UTC)


 * The number has been cut down to 570.  Triplestop  x3  21:56, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Down to 540 now thanks to your hard work. I have done a few cleanups. Plus.. strangely... I have picked up on an IP from Western Canada (a fairly regular IP editor) as well as an IP from Australia that have been working hard removing the links. So kudos to the community for helping to take out the trash. You should actually add the WP:ALBUM project page to your watchlist as the IP user who keeps re-adding these links has tried to remove the website from the Album Projects "do not use" list of non-professional review sites. Also worth watching is the 2009 in heavy metal music article. It has no metal-observer spam but the IP who keeps re-adding has a special fondness for that article and so it helps to track his daily IP switches simply by monitoring that page. All the IPs are one user who used to go under the account name "Prophaniti" You can look at that accounts last edit history before he supposedly quit... he had gone into a single purpose agenda of adding and protecting links to the metal-observer website. He claims to not be one of the unemployed students, plumbers or furniture movers that website uses for its "expert" staff reviews. But he seems awfully PO'd when anyone tries to remove one. Its a low quality sh*tty site... not worth defending... unless you are one of the sh*tty contributors to it. 99% of all webzines devoted to heavy metal are useless and should be blacklisted. So far I've managed to get 3 turfed... metal-observer will be lucky #4. Eventually ... hopefully... all amateur online heavy metal fanzines will be blacklisted from Wikipedia. All in due time. Thanks for your help. Have a nice day! The Real Libs-speak politely 00:23, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Non-professional (spam) review sites
Kudos to all your work in the "MO" cleanup. Perhaps, if have time, You could assist removing all the spammy/amateur "Sea of Tranquility" sites.(see link I copied for Master Hu12's talk page ) The Real Libs-speak politely 16:40, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Re: Userpage Shield
Re your message: Thank you and you're welcome. =) He really tried to take it out on you.  It was pretty funny. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:42, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

The Offspring's Ninth Studio Album
Thanks. I hadn't noticed that. Just the redirect left. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 20:22, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Honor your father and your mother
Hi there. You redirected the above to Ten Commandments and the creator has undone this and requested a dialogue on consensus. I think it ought to be a rdr as well and have proposed such on the talk page. Cheers SGGH ping! 23:35, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

User:Joklolk
I also think that the account is suspicious; it was created only a few days ago, and immediately it started creating articles and had good knowledge of Wikipedia's features. The IP you mentioned (Special:Contributions/144.26.92.12) belongs to blocked user User:ViperNerd, take a look here:. Offliner (talk) 12:52, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The account popped up around the time ViperNerd was blocked, and the IP was used to votestack on the AfD for Joklolk's page, so I strongly suspect there is a connection here.  Triplestop  x3  12:54, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure if Joklolk is ViperNerd. They mostly edit different kinds of articles, although there are some overlaps, such as this: . Obviously, it appears that Joklolk is not the first account of this user, but I don't know who the master account would be. There are many editors with a similar POV on related subjects. Offliner (talk) 13:18, 6 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Just make sure that you don't directly accuse people of being a sock without filing an SPI investigation - it falls under WP:CIV. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 13:18, 6 August 2009 (UTC)


 * The user turned out to be something much worse.  Triplestop  x3  03:10, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Spam alert
See the link at the foot of this page History_of_animal_testing. It is clearly spam for an activist group. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.63.75.2 (talk) 09:44, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

✅ Thanks for the heads up.  Triplestop  x3  13:37, 7 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Check out the entry for Rainhill. In the 'People and culture' section I am not sure we really need to be treated to a few shameless plugs for the local restaurants, do we? 193.63.75.2 (talk) 13:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Max Bollinger
Let's forget WP:ENT, as voice-over actors have a hard time meeting it. I am guessing that those suggesting he does not meet WP:AUTHOR based that opinion upon the 2 audio books in the original version of the article (now improved), and not upon a cursory look at Google Books. It seems Bollinger used his language skills to make the crossover from writing to acting and voicework, and has returned to books of late... now in audio format. Care to help me dig to see if his earlier books have received favorable reviews? MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 00:20, 9 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I can't find anything to suggest the books are notable nor much RS on him but I'm changing to keep since the career part seems to assert more major roles now.  Triplestop  x3  01:20, 9 August 2009 (UTC)


 * When I get time I'll be digging for reviews of his books and anything related to his voice work. Kids books usualy get reviewed someplace... and the ones he acted as translator may well have reviews in other languahes. Best regards, MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 03:10, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

confused
You refused this:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Virtual_Hunterston

I am totally confused i do not understand why, I thought it made it clear what it was. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.8.115.168 (talk) 20:47, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

How can I prove things I was born there I know the place like the back of my hand, all information is 100% accurate. I do not believe in lies feel free to contact PhilipsConnoco, Taylor Woodrow, Corus, Clydeport, Britsih Nuclear and magnox to verify all this, they are they ones that provided all information for the industrial sites and the main site is from personal experience and knowlege —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.8.115.168 (talk) 21:10, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Suspected sock ring
Thanks for the heads-up. Actually, I doubt it's a specific ring, but probably a shared technique; that is, an attempt to leave up a page long enough to be picked up by Google but not long enough to be noticed by Wikipedia editors. When I come across them, I slap a db-author tag on them to be rid of them. --Calton | Talk 05:48, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Canada Export Centre
Are you using Beta too? I have the nagging suspicion that, for instance in the application of speedies, two users can do so at almost the same time, without there being an edit conflict reported: just look at the history of the article. This time I beat another editor (you) to it; twice already today I place a speedy template and when I get to the editor's page for the notification I find that someone else actually placed the template and posted a warning--without ever seeing an edit conflict notice. Drmies (talk) 19:30, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I was using Twinkle to do it. You must have placed the speedy between the time TW checks the page and submits the speedy. TW does not handle edit conflicts.  Triplestop  x3  19:35, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Haha, so it's your fault. I saw you reported the user name; thanks. Drmies (talk) 19:35, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

The Neverending Bambifan Saga
Gawd, this kid has just got to go. I am honestly sitting here in silent horror over this idiot's obsessive behavior. As I just told Vicenarian, there's a formal complaint to Bell South in the works, so all we can do is to wait. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

If you have a chance
Latin metal is being battled over and currently an AfD. I personally don't think it exists and have voted to delete. The debate is sorta dead-even Perhaps you could opine on it. The Real Libs-speak politely 15:38, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I personally don't think the page should be kept. However I do get annoyed when people add the rescue thing causing the votestacking.  Triplestop  x3  16:35, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting IP 68.229.65.232 on my talkpage. Cheers ;)--Hu12 (talk) 16:25, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you know what it said?  Triplestop  x3  16:26, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * No, however that IP is associated with this case. Quite a long history of abuse, including harassment of other Wikipedians. The attack on me was most assuridly based on the site being recently Blacklisted. I suspect there may be more attacks, Its the users MO. --Hu12 (talk) 16:33, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * It said "Hu12 is (name) from (school)". Don't worry though I had it oversighted  Triplestop  x3  16:34, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * sent a duplicate of the post through Wikipedias mail system using the "Maldavir" account. Since Dattorro has been blocked indeff for harassment, Maldavir (sockpuppet) is now as-well. --Hu12 (talk) 16:51, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

CSD
Hi, I just CSD'D The ooze.com, and saw you had notified the user of the CSD but had not actually CSD'd the page? -- Scythre Talk Contribs 19:30, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Twinkle is getting a little buggy lately.  Triplestop  x3  19:30, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks


 Dylan 620  (contribs, logs)help us! has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Thank you for seeing to my request at WP:VPT. Best,  Dylan 620  (contribs, logs)help us! 17:01, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

UAA
Hi Triplestop, I know you're a regular, but there was one report that doesn't quite violate the username policy.


 * &mdash; Violation of username policy because it's a promotional username; Made promotinoal edits to Liverpool John Moores University.  Triplestop  x3  16:15, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 * ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:24, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

I'd just like to notify you of this, because you obviously reported the username in good faith. We all make mistakes, especially me. Keep up the good work.  ceran  thor 12:26, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Futurepop
There is no reason for speed deletion. --Feu Follet (talk) 21:10, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not repost the page again, take it to WP:DRV if you want it kept. Thanks,  Triplestop  x3  21:11, 16 August 2009 (UTC)


 * It was a new page. --Feu Follet (talk) 21:12, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

ACC request
I confirm that I made the request for an account on the ACC site.  Triplestop  x3  03:16, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey there. I have granted you access to the account creation tool; please be sure to read the guide before you start working there. Thanks for helping out! NW ( Talk ) 03:20, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Deletion hold
TripleStop,

I am working to edit the getaroom.com page to make it less spam-y and like an ad. That is not our intention, as we are just trying to create a page about the company. Could we take it down and have time to re-edit? Please let me know next steps and any suggestions for improvement.

Thank you. Knhall (talk) 20:42, 17 August 2009 (UTC)knhall

Smells like "deer poo."
Methinks our little menace took a tip from the one page out of MascotGuy's playbook or possibly Grawp's. How "original" of him. I've never seen mental illness like his up close like this before; it's truly frightening. I've always had a habit of reading things in both forward and reverse. I wish I were logged on when "Teletubbies suck" came up in reverse on the new user log! :) I'm still waiting to hear back from one of the bureaucrats on this site whom I trust.  I've told him of this little jackass and with any luck, he can get this issue resolved by a rangeblock or formal complaint.  I'll also request a quick CU on that account since this was the last straw as far as I'm concerned.  By that I mean that I will personally file a TOS violation complaint with BellSouth if this latest attack comes back as being from there.  Thanks for the alert.  If you so much as think you've spotted him again, please let me know.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 20:58, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:4im
Template:4im has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 16:49, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Re: Desiphral
Thanks, I'm still awaiting on input from other checkusers. Other accounts you can find from there would be helpful. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 22:06, 14 September 2009 (UTC)