User talk:Tripod86/Archive 3

When creating articles...
...Can you please add categories? It makes it so much easier for people viewing Wikipedia to find the subject if they can't remember the name. Please take this on board, it is vital, as I have noticed you haven't seemed to have taken in points I or other editors have made. Thanks and happy editing! - Erebus555 (talk) 20:58, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Darcy Flynn
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Darcy Flynn, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Darcy Flynn. slakr \ talk / 16:40, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Categories
Hi. When you create a new page, can you add a relevant category to it please? There is currently a backlog of >5500 pages that need categories (see Category:Category needed). If you could add categories to your pages, this would help keep the backlog to a minimum. Cheers Nouse4aname (talk) 20:37, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Milton Keynes shopping centre
Does the reference (Buildings of Britain) specifically mention Merry Hill? Becuase if not you shouldn't really put it in the sentence covered by the citation. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 13:14, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Footman James
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Footman James, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 15:31, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Michael Adams (Businessman)
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Michael Adams (Businessman), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 00:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Wally Francis (CBSO)
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Wally Francis (CBSO), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 00:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Gordon Morgan
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Gordon Morgan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 00:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Mike Seal
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Mike Seal, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 00:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Stan Yapp
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Stan Yapp, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 00:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Stephen Maddock (CBSO)
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Stephen Maddock (CBSO), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 00:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Rescue suites, it's the saved articles!!!
'''The MG 5 car, RAF Beachy Head and RAF Blyton''' have been sorced and saved!--86.29.249.150 (talk) 10:04, 8 February 2008 (UTC) I will try and sort out any more RAF stuff for you.--86.25.50.145 (talk) 10:10, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

[] [] [] [] []--86.29.247.134 (talk) 10:19, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

A source I used- []--86.29.241.241 (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

The Drakenstein Correctional Centre [] and Norman Brennan []-- are safe now!86.29.253.165 (talk) 19:28, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

I've sourced and rescued- Mike Seal [], Stan Yapp [], Stephen Maddock (CBSO) [], Gordon Morgan [], 20 Forthlin Road [] and M40 minibus crash []!!! --86.29.249.31 (talk) 19:13, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

The Parkhead Viaduct is safe now!--86.25.49.65 (talk) 01:41, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

I added to both Mrs Kerri Green‎, Hereford and Worcester‎, Perryfields High School‎, Manor Foundation Business, Enterprise and Sports College, Old Oscott‎, Lozells and Kingswinford.--86.29.251.217 (talk) 16:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Iv'e saved James V. Crosby and Pedmore Technology College today.--86.29.242.138 (talk) 20:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Kevin Whitton is safe now.--86.29.252.143 (talk) 00:37, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

I've sourced up the Leonora Children's Cancer Fund for you. --86.29.247.173 (talk) 14:50, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Someone else has saved Roe Green Park for you.--86.29.247.173 (talk) 14:50, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Roe Green Park
Roe Green Park is now safe. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.29.247.234 (talk) 00:55, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

It is worth keeping, I'm looking up some more sources for it to.--86.29.241.148 (talk) 15:46, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Wilfred Carter (politician)
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Wilfred Carter (politician), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 00:15, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Kevin Whitton
An article that you have been involved in editing, Kevin Whitton, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Kevin Whitton. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --86.29.247.254 (talk) 07:16, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kevin Whitton
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kevin Whitton, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? 86.29.245.41 (talk) 07:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC)