User talk:Tripp523

If you post, then you need to sign. Also, do not charge others with your own guilt.

I amnot editing right now. Perhaps the IP's should be checked for location. Tripp523

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. &mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 18:42, 21 March 2014 (UTC) It is User:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah who is participating in Edit Warring; said user is also in violation of remaining neutral. He has deleted information and replaced it with biased information. Read his edits in the following articles. Said user replaced an external link to http://scisa.org/ with a link to a biased article at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Carolina_Independent_School_Association.

Said user has violated The three-revert rule numerous times, and then made false accusations against me. He was warned about this, but then he had me blocked after he/she was warned. Said user is also in violation of being biased.

User:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah seems to have no interest or affiliation with the entity of the article in question, and the edits by said user seem more intent on maleficent than information. Also, you need to investigate said users edits in the following pages:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Segregation_academies

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Charleston_Collegiate_School&action=history

Compare said users edits with that of the official school website and the Wikipedia article about said school before and after User:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah's edits.

March 2014
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Charleston Collegiate School. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  → Call me  Hahc  21  19:05, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
&mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 05:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

I have added an extra two days to the block on this account because you have continued the edit war while logged out. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:34, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

This is a false accusation; you will be held legally accountable for your accusations and actions. ~Tripp523

Proof of violation is required before accusations are made. Tripp523 (talk) 17:16, 22 March 2014 (UTC)Tripp523.

User:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah's claims to have made warnings, but nothing was signed as required by "Sign your posts on talk pages: Tripp523 (talk) 17:16, 22 March 2014 (UTC)"

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
&mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 15:01, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

I have been falsely accused. Word is spreading by the people who are actually associated with Charleston Collegiate School about the hijacking of the page by User:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah, and others are responding to his labeling of this school and his removal of actual information.


 * Interesting. All Alf's warnings have been signed. The fact that he has "no interest or affiliation" with the school, as you note above, obviously makes him a lot less likely to be "in violation of being biased" than those who are affiliated with it. (Compare the conflict of interest policy, but common sense should tell you the same.) That's apart from the fact that Alf's edits are sourced to reliable third-party sources (not to the school's own promotional website). I note also your suggestive last sentence "Word is spreading by the people who are actually associated with Charleston Collegiate School about the hijacking of the page", etc. Are you aware of the rule against recruting people for the purpose of coming to Wikipedia and agreeing with you? See this policy.


 * Nobody likes being blocked, and a certain amount of venting on talkpages is expected, but if you go on attacking Alf, or make any more legal threats (click on that link, if you click on nothing else!), I will remove your talkpage access for the duration of the block. Bishonen &#124; talk 19:06, 22 March 2014 (UTC).