User talk:Tris Wilson/Archive 1

Question
The YouTube video linked at My Favourite Waste of Time uses the word "cock" in its title. The word was replaced by "***" in violation of Wikipedia's policy on censorship. And I'm a vandal?  City O f  Silver  20:49, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 21:15, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Your request for rollback
Hi Fox Wilson. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Mifter (talk) 00:29, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 27 December 2012 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding  to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Vacation nine 01:08, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Kevin12xd (talk) (contribs) 03:02, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Vacation nine 15:54, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

You are now a reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges. A full list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on will be at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 11:08, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Fox supports Wikipedia to do Vandalism to the pages Micro1975791soft edited!!!
Wikipedia is not a vandals' park, so every deletion equals to vandalism!!! Micro1975791soft (talk) 02:38, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * No - some things do have to go. Please see Articles for deletion/Windows Blue for why it was deleted before and why it will probably be deleted again.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:45, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Just because I nominate a page for speedy deletion doesn't mean that I'm a vandal - I did look over a rather relevant discussion before tagging the page and believe that my reasoning was correct. Also, what do you mean by "every deletion equals vandalism?" I am not biased against your edits or anything - it's just because of the discussion I mentioned earlier and WP:CRYSTAL. Thanks again for contributing to Wikipedia. It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 03:05, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I know it now, thanks, but Wikipedia is not a vandal's park, do not do vandalism to every page, except the pages violates Wikipedia rules. It's a Microsoft! Welcome to talk to me! Micro1975791soft (talk) 04:18, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


 * By "do not do vandalism, " what do you mean? My contribs are full of anti-vandalism edits. Do you mean tagging pages with CSD? It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 04:23, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Unauthourized Edit(Not Comment or correction) is a sort of vandalism. It's a Microsoft! Welcome to talk to me!Micro1975791soft (talk) 04:27, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Not all prohibited edits are vandalism, but a big majority of them are. See what vandalism is and what it isn't.--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:49, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * OK, I know.Micro1975791soft (talk) 08:26, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

This is regarding Hares Youssef page, In fact the word Hares is an Arabic word and name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeiboul (talk • contribs) 17:07, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, but you still haven't addressed my notability concern. It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 17:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC)