User talk:Trivialist/Archive 2

"Deuteragonist"
Is there a reason you're removing every single reference to this word?— Ryulong ( 琉竜 ) 13:25, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm mostly removing the uses where it's been added gratuitously and without sourcing. For example, labeling tritagonists of Fresh Prince of Bel-Air.Trivialist (talk) 13:54, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay. Still your removals on JoJolion kinda broke things (as you removed references to earlier editions).— Ryulong ( 琉竜 ) 14:45, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that. I'll be more careful in the future. Trivialist (talk) 18:24, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Jewelpet falls to that too. That shouldn't be removed also.--Blackgaia02 (Talk if you&#39;re Worthy) (talk) 01:54, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Hey There
There is currently a discussion regarding the lead paragraph on the talk page of Sony Pictures Entertainment. As a previous editor of this article your input would be appreciated. Regards. MisterShiney   ✉    08:07, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SpongeBob SquarePants, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TV5 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

franklin episodes page
trivia,could you help me with the Franklin episodes page, the air dates are incorrect, there were six seasons of the show and we need plots!81.135.85.247 (talk) 22:55, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Category:Comedy concept albums
Category:Comedy concept albums, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:06, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jenna Miscavige Hill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Morrow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

"Where Are Your Keys?" rename
I renamed Where Are Your Keys? back to "Where Are Your Keys?". See the Talk page as to why, and let us know if you disagree. Thanks!

— JBazuzi (talk • contribs) 07:05, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Talk:The Walking Dead (season 4)
Hello Trivialist. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Talk:The Walking Dead (season 4), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: An article that was created on a Talk page instead of an article page. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:00, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Category:Sponsored albums
Category:Sponsored albums, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:38, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Bespoke Music (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Time FM


 * I Love New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Sodom

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Questions of courtesy and protocol
Hello, Trivialist.

I asked a question here almost 4 days ago, but there's been a stony silence so far.

I wonder if you, as the instigator of the deletion in question, can say something about my concerns.

Thank you. --  Jack of Oz   [Talk]  05:50, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

According to Wikipedia listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect According to Wikipedia. Since you had some involvement with the According to Wikipedia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Peter&#160;James (talk) 17:59, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Rated PG
Greetings! After conducting a thorough investigation and determining that neither Parental Guidance (film), nor Parental Guidance (song), nor Parental Guidance (TV series) is known by the name, Rated PG, I have reverted your redirect of PG rating to the disambiguation page for these media. The only article listed on the page for which that phrase can be used is Motion picture rating system, so I have restored the redirect to that page. Cheers! bd2412 T 20:33, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
The Bushranger One ping only 16:22, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: RZA
Hello Trivialist. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of RZA, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not an uncontroversial move, use requested moves instead. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:58, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Winter storm naming
I just wanted to make you aware of this discussion I started at Winter storm naming. I have no intentions of making any changes to the article myself, but was just hoping to get input from editors previously involved in the article (or recently-closed AfD) in an effort to improve the article and clarify its purpose. I will leave any changes to the consensus of other editors who decide what's best. Your participation would be welcome, regardless of your views on the issue. Thank you. 76.189.111.199 (talk) 22:37, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Mute (magazine)
I've twice restored and  to this article, as Mute is a magazine about internet culture and internet art. If you still think there is some reason to remove them, explain why on the talk page. Don't perform a third unexplained removal. — Hex    (❝  ?!  ❞)   14:41, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, that's a good solution. Best, — Hex    (❝  ?!  ❞)   14:24, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Disney Vault Help
The source I used for Mulan to show that is moratorium as I pointed out here they are both following the "vaulting" traditions of those that get moratorium by Disney. So I am worried that it maybe an issue. 184.58.22.86 (talk) 20:10, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Internet culture
Hi Trivialist, I noticed that you've been removing "Category:Internet culture" from a large number of articles and I was wondering if this was a personal decision or if it was pursuant to consensus developed through discussion. I'm also curious what the criteria are. Why are you removing it from some articles and not others? -Thibbs (talk) 03:29, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Disney Vault
As a contributor to the page, and a reliable editor, I wonder if you'd have anything to add to this discussion. --Rob Sinden (talk) 09:28, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Who Framed Roger Rabbit#RfC: Is mentioning every speaking character actor in the cast section relevant?
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Who Framed Roger Rabbit. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 17:33, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Five-Timers Club
For some reason you keep deleting my addition to the page. This is important information. The names I added are the only 6 people that can become Five-Timers at this point. Anyone reading the page would be curious to know who might be next. These 6 people have all hosted four times. I cited a webpage that was previously sourced to this page as proof.

Why would adding this information have some objection? It is all facts that tie directly to the page it is on. SNL host fan (talk) 01:18, 12 March 2013 (UTC)


 * SNL host fan, I posted this on your talk page, but I'll put it here since you have started a discussion on this page. Please stop adding content about four-timers. Multiple editors have objected to its inclusion and you have been asked to discuss it on the talk page and try to get consensus. Also, even if consensus were to include the content, the heading "Future Five Timers" is inappropriate because there's no way to know if any of them will ever host again. Btw, the source you're using (snl.jt.org/guest) is not reliable and cannot be used. Interestingly, someone started a talk page thread about that source last year. But the problem is not about sourcing or speculation, as you think. It is simply about whether the content is worthy of inclusion in the article. You will need to get consensus on the article's talk page, so please stop continually adding the contact after other editors have objected to it. So far, you are using your account for one purpose only and it is starting to become a problem. --76.189.111.2 (talk) 02:24, 12 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Btw, there was a discussion between two editors about this on the article's talk page in November. Perhaps there are enough editors who will agree that four-timers should be included; those who think it would be interesting and important enough to know who's one show away from making the list. But again, you need to get consensus for that. 76.189.111.2 (talk) 02:41, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

TRS-80 proposed split
Hi there,

I notice that you recently contributed to the TRS-80 article and wondered if you were interested in adding your opinion to the discussion on the proposed article split. If you have no strong opinion either way, or don't wish to contribute, please feel free to ignore this message. Thank you for your time. Ubcule (talk) 16:08, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Over the Edge (radio), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Non-sequitur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 21:36, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject U2 invitation
Hello! This message is to inform you that WikiProject U2 needs your input! Please, join this discussion on this talk page!

You may add yourself to our member list below by clicking here!

–p joe f (talk • contribs) 11:58, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

On the removal of categories from redirects
Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I restored your removal of a valid category Category:Noise reduction from redirect Telefunken telcom c4. Some people seem to assume that categories and inter-wiki links were not allowed on redirect pages, while in fact they are and we should categorize redirects much more than we do at present (where it makes sense, of course). A common example are the various R template categories, but categories on redirect pages are also needed to make an article show up in the same or different category listing(s) under different subject titles (so that readers find it under the name they look for). Telefunken telcom c4 is a perfect example for this.

I haven't checked your other recent edits, but if you removed categories from other similar redirects as well, please restore them yourself. They serve a purpose. Greetings. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 20:09, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chickenfoot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Anthony (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Bill Cosby in advertising
Thank you for your cleanup edits to this article, very much appreciated! -- Zanimum (talk) 14:30, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fluorescent lamps and health, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flicker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:19, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made&#32;to Paramount Pictures: you may already know about them, but you might find Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. —me_and 23:39, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=551884590 your edit] to Ashes to Ashes (play) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave my operator a message on his talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:13, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Pending release of Notifications
Hey :). I'm dropping you a note because you have signed up for the Notifications, or Echo, newsletter.

If all goes according to plan, we should be launching Echo on en-wiki either tomorrow, or next Tuesday - I'll drop a followup tomorrow when we know what's happening. Should the launch succeed, we'll begin the process of triaging bugs and gathering feedback on what features work, what cause problems, and what we should do next; I hope you'll help us out on these fronts by leaving any comments you might have on the talkpage.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:47, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Your removal of "the late" from numerous articles
Would you care to explain how "the late" is an honorific? It's not a style with regards to manner of address nor is it a title for a person. It's standard convention in English to reference a deceased person X as "the late" X (as you well know by the all the articles you have unilaterally removed "the late" from) but that doesn't make it an honorific by any definition I know of.

Furthermore, let's say you're right, MOS:HONORIFIC says "Where an honorific is so commonly attached to a name that the name is rarely found in English reliable sources without it, it should be included. For example, the honorific may be included for "Father Coughlin" (currently at Charles Coughlin) and Mother Teresa." The late is very commonly attached to the names of the deceases, again as you well know from all the instances from which you removed it from. As it is standard convention, English reliable sources do indeed prefix the names of the deceased with "the late" and as such MOS:HONORIFIC doesn't apply here. Transcendence (talk) 04:14, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * You can't make that judgment call to say that it's an "effective" honorific. It either is or isn't. I don't know of any convention or standard or even any professional writer that restricts usage of "the late" to only those they have positive feelings for.
 * You doubt people would use it with Saddam Hussein or Kim Jong-Il? You're wrong, here are some examples:
 * http://www.iol.co.za/news/world/hunt-for-saddam-s-deputy-begins-1.1502606
 * http://www.boston.com/politicalintelligence/2013/04/10/live-updates-from-the-gop-senate-debate/VIz89fpjXvayXdzeWqEKIK/story.html
 * dailynews.co.tz/index.php/columnists/columnists/lawi-joel/15974-dar-s-3-eyed-clock-tower-mother-of-all-liars
 * http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/3589699/The-war-That-was-all-over-two-weeks-ago.html
 * http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,377443,00.html
 * http://www.nknews.org/2013/04/kim-jong-ils-grandson-missing-in-bosnia/
 * http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2103158,00.html
 * http://articles.latimes.com/2011/dec/27/world/la-fg-korea-kim-funeral-20111228
 * http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2011/12/116_101869.html


 * As you can see, it's standard convention. The exception from MOS:HONORIFIC applies here, not that I'm saying it is an honorific, I maintain it isn't. But from your point of view it is, so with regards to your argument, the exception applies. I don't know what you're talking about when you say it's to express positive feelings. Whether or not all the deceases should have their names appended with this is irrelevant to the issue of you removing "the late" from the articles that you already have.Transcendence (talk) 04:36, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Category:Women writers from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Category:Women writers from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 22:37, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

IP 201.198.168.150
Heya, I noticed that you reverted an unreferenced edit from 201.198.168.150 at The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie 2. This "contributor" is responsible for a ton of hoax nonsense on various articles related to children's television. Rodolfootoya12 is one of his sock accounts. Just mentioning it as an FYI. Take care, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:49, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
 * UPDATE: Looks like he's using Mariootoya30 as well. Reported that account to SPI. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:56, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tom & Jerry Kids, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hal Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

The Fairly Oddaprents International Brodcasting
Es-tu fou?! vous ne pouvez pas rediriger List of TV Networks airing The Fairly OddParents à The Fairly Oddparents! I speak English and French. So you may wanan translate it. 99.229.41.79 (talk) 17:26, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Administrator
Are you an Administrator because I saw one of your edits on |his talk page and this one is for administrators only 99.229.41.79 (talk) 18:58, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Notifications box replacement prototypes released
Hey Trivialist; Kaldari has finished scripting a set of potential replacements available to test and give feedback on. Please go to this thread for more detail on how to enable them. Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 15:31, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Are you British?
Did you lived in the UK caused you did put the template where you lived. NewFranco (talk) 01:43, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Understand what he's saying, are you a British Man and a Londoner?! 99.229.41.79 (talk) 22:15, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm not connected to NewFranco
I'm not connected to him 99.229.41.79 (talk) 22:30, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

AIV report re 99.229.41.79
How do, fellow UK res: In case you care to weigh in on wot this editor has done, I've filed an AIV report. Cheerio. It's a jolly 'oliday with Mary, innit? Go Spurs! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:39, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm realli' apologized fo that misunderstanding and fo wot I did wrong to him. 99.229.41.79 fo bad reasons (talk) 10:56, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

TV Broadcast sections
Hey Trivialist. Those "International broadcast" tables bug the crap out of me as well, but I'm not sure if just deleting them is the best answer. Whenever I come across them I just rewrite them to only include English-language broadcasts, sources (if any otherwise tag the section), and the dates (all as per MOS:TV. It takes a few minutes but isn't that difficult. Of course you are under no obligation to do that work it's just it would be nicer. Or even if you just leave me a message on my talk page when you delete them then I'll rewrite them when I get around to it. Thanks. SQGibbon (talk) 23:00, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Elmo's World edits by 67.190.23.66
I'm not familiar with the show but the info being changed looks dubious. I noticed that you have worked to cleanup the article. I am suspicious of this editor based on his edits to List of Titus episodes which are definitely incorrect and possibly a hoax, as I noted on his talk page, but don't have enough info to back up my feeling of falsification of info in Elmo's World. If this editor is disruptive he should be blocked, but I can't prove it. --Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:33, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Contact details
Hi Trivialist, i would like to discuss some of your edits. Actually, i think it's best to do it in private. Could you please live some e-mail you are using or any other contact info. It's pretty urgent. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.222.33.18 (talk) 13:10, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Pretty bold edit
at Novelty song with no discussion first. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 19:44, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Abandonment (existentialism) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Humanity


 * Journey Escape (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Scarab


 * Satiric misspelling (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Amerika

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:34, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

RE: Weird Al album images
I was uploading wider versions, but they have been reduced to fair use. Koala15 (talk) 14:08, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

FYI
You have an admirer.



 Them From  Space  15:18, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * FYI the relevant range block is Just point an admin to this range if it happens again. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:34, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * FYI the relevant range block is Just point an admin to this range if it happens again. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:34, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * FYI the relevant range block is Just point an admin to this range if it happens again. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:34, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * FYI the relevant range block is Just point an admin to this range if it happens again. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:34, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * FYI the relevant range block is Just point an admin to this range if it happens again. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:34, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * FYI the relevant range block is Just point an admin to this range if it happens again. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:34, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

IP reverting all edits by User:Trivialist
I've popped something on the noticeboard. --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:35, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=555135671 your edit] to Paul Williams (songwriter) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=555567571 your edit] to Abandonment (existentialism) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=556186699 your edit] to Tiffany Theater may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=556763337 your edit] to List of Alex Rider characters may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

Template:It's a Wonderful Life
This homage/tribute happens to have an article. Are there others that have articles that are not on the template?--TheMovieBuff (talk) 19:47, 25 May 2013 (UTC)


 * I changed my mind and removed it.--TheMovieBuff (talk) 19:59, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Kim Possible characters
Haya, you left a banner on the KP characters page as to questionable content. It would be helpful if you went to the Talk page and say *exactly* what elements you're referring to. I don't know your level of familiarity with the subject matter, but I assure you as an expert on it, slowly going through it top to bottom, there is very little to question. —Love Robin (talk) 03:58, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

lower case for redirects
I see that you made an edit at Dailyindependent.com. If you looked at the edit history, you will see that I had a problem with Template:lowercase title. Do you know what the story is as to why that doesn't work? I spent at least half an hour searching, but didn't find the answer. Thanks, Unscintillating (talk) 22:23, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Keek
Please refrain from any further removal of information from the Keek wiki page. Such removal of information will be seen as vandalism to the page and reported. If you believe that the information has been written in an advertisement fashion please feel free to re-write the information from a neutral stand point instead of removing it. All information added to the page has been properly sourced and cited. Arendiel (talk) 14:09, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Club RTL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Life (TV Series)


 * GXT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Freaky


 * RTL 8 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Charlie's Angels (TV series)


 * Vida TV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Ureña

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Your PROD
Thanks for PRODing Rather-Be-Hunting Guy. I am removing your PROD tags and nominating it for CSD G-11. It's blatant self promotion / advertising. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:04, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

regarding wikipedia's Manwin page
Hi Trivialist. Thank you for your message and the information. I also appreciate that you thoughtfully reviewed my editing, leaving the changes you believed were appropriate, and removing the ones you believed were not.

I think "adult entertainment" in this context is a weasel word

"A weasel word may be an informal term[1] for equivocating words and phrases aimed at creating an impression that something specific and meaningful has been said, when in fact only a vague or ambiguous claim, or even a refutation has been communicated.

The use of weasel words to avoid making an outright assertion is a synonym to tergiversate.

tergiversation: The act of evading any clear course of action or speech, of being deliberately ambiguous

I think the term "adult entertainment" should be changed to sex trade or sex industry. The sex trade consists of businesses which either directly or indirectly provide sex-related products and services. The sex industry is the industry formed of commercial enterprises which employ sex workers. What they offer is called adult entertainment, as it comprises a number of forms of entertainment not considered suitable for children. Therefore, adult entertainment is something offered by the sex industry. By saying that they are an adult entertainment company, they make it seem that the pornography is something offered by the adult entertainment industry. This is the opposite of what it really means. Furthermore, on wikipedia, searching adult entertainment redirects to the page sex industry.

However, if you think that adult entertainment and sex industry refer to different things, I suggest to write it like this: Manwin is a company that sells adult entertainment and that is part of the sex industry.

Concerning replacing the words porn by pornography, porn is considered an informal word for pornography I think that being informal about a term like this is a way to make it look more acceptable. Also, what is the problem with using the formal word?

Thanks Trivialist for your work.

--173.179.223.70 (talk) 16:43, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Reverting possible Vandalism
Cut it out Already! All of your actions of perfecting the site are nothing more that pure vandalism! I will not tolerate this! DayKey (talk) 07:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moving Pictures (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Additional sources
I had a bunch of additional sources for the edit you reverted that I was busy editing in and saw your revert only because my session had expired, I have added a few more to the list attached below. The information is topical as Spamhaus is in the news now (for other reasons). The_Spamhaus_Project

Playing hard to get
As a operation that tries to protect the bulk of the internet mail users from pointless spam they most likely suffer from some measure of attacks. Some of the attacks are probably email based to which end they seem to have resorted to removing meaningful contact information from thir web site and the public sphere. They are also mostly indifferent to the problems caused by false positive flagging of legitemite and conforming servers on their PBL lists when their policies conflict with those of other organisations like Rackspace, AWS at Amazon and others that are not prepared or able to manage their static IP address space more dilligently as demanded by Spamhaus.

Idyllic press (talk) 20:39, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

I just noticed the references are not displayed here, perhaps a missing reflist or something. I will add the sources to the talk page then and people can follow them there if they are interested. Idyllic press (talk) 13:39, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Category:Albums produced by Daft Punk
Category:Albums produced by Daft Punk, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:45, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dolby Surround 7.1, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Trance (film) and Delivery Man (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

West Holmes High School
Refrain from removing useful information from "West Holmes High School." I am generally the only individual who updates the article. I DO NOT appreciate the removal of information for no valid reason. If you feel that a particular portion of the article needs to be revised, then discuss the situation in an adult-oriented manner. Otherwise, refrain from vandalizing an article that already needs more improvement!

--Michael Phillips (talk) 13:22, 26 June 2013 (UTC).(michaelw352)

June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=558039350 your edit] to Grand Canyonscope may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=558839335 your edit] to The Addams Family (pinball) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=561504329 your edit] to A Christmas Carol (2009 film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:02, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The film was released in Disney Digital 3-D and IMAX 3-D . It is also Disney's third film retelling of A Christmas Carol following 1983's ''[[Mickey's

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=561754603 your edit] to SMTV Live may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:12, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * memorable episode featured Brian's sisters as the contenders, while a third featured [Jade Goody].

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=562035991 your edit] to Blond Ambition World Tour Live may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:23, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * #"Where's the Party"

Speedy deletion declined: Boston Luxe Real Estate LLC
Hello Trivialist. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Boston Luxe Real Estate LLC, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not previously been deleted via a deletion discussion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:31, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Branded Content
I don't think it's self promoting. All information added to the page has been properly sourced and cited, it gives a picture of Branded Content historical development, and written to state the fact, that Branded Content has been acknowledged as a serious creative tool in the advertising and media industry. This can not be done without, mentioning names of industry leaders and organisations.I'm open for your point view, but please more constructive instead of just removing the content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jan godsk (talk • contribs) 07:47, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Logos
Trivialist: "the logo is a very small part of the subject, and not worth its own link". Then it is completely not worth any effort -- which is greater than linking -- to upload to WP and add images to the article. Please, go and remove every image every where on WP. --Spshu (talk) 22:03, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
 * O and you have spend lots more time removing these harmless links then it is worth, since you value it so lowly. --Spshu (talk) 22:05, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marvin Glass and Associates, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaylord (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=563429192 your edit] to Long-range reconnaissance patrol may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:12, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * A Shau, and Quang Tri],'' revised ed., Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Lanham, MD (2009). The concept of scouts date back to the origins of warfare itself, however, in modern times

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=563429358 your edit] to Battle of Signal Hill Vietnam may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:13, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * A Shau, and Quang Tri],'' revised ed., Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Lanham, MD, (2009).

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=563430818 your edit] to Long-range reconnaissance patrol may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:26, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * A Shau, and Quang Tri],'' revised ed., Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Lanham, MD (2009). The concept of scouts date back to the origins of warfare itself, however, in modern times
 * A Shau, and Quang Tri''], revised ed., Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Lanham, MD (2009).

Category:Song recordings produced by Daft Punk
Category:Song recordings produced by Daft Punk, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:31, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Music and Lyrics, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Craig Thomas and Ron Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Censorship vs interested editing of Wikipedia
Hi Trivialist,

You reverted my edit to "Internet Censorship".

I think that there's a reasonable definition, something like: editing the public record, in order to suppress some correct piece of information.

What word do you think it should be attached to?

If that was being done to Wikipedia, where on Wikipedia do you think it should be documented?

ArthurDent006.5 (talk) 00:18, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Original Music and Lyrics, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fame (TV series), Police Woman and Billy Barnes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Who Framed Roger Rabbit?
I know that it is non-free, it says on an image page! All images in Who Framed Roger Rabbit article are non-free, they are fair use! Like the ones you just deleted from a bunch of articles without much thought that i tried to save... It takes time to upload an image or make a meaningful contribution, takes nothing to cut and claim afterward that you have scored! Best --Murus (talk) 02:11, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Non-free content can be used in articles only if:

The article already has several non-free images. You can't add non-free images to articles just to "score." Trivialist (talk) 02:17, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Its usage would be considered fair use in United States copyright law and also complies with the Non-free content criteria;
 * 2) It is used for a purpose that cannot be fulfilled by free material (text or images, existing or to be created); and
 * 3) It has a valid rationale indicating why its usage would be considered fair use within Wikipedia policy and US law.
 * I have read Non-free content before, thank you very much! By the way, all images that you deleted were marked as orphaned and I specifically mentioned it! Just a thought, it looks like you have appointed yourself a final arbitrator on how many fair-use images can be incorporated into articles? Regards --Murus (talk) 02:41, 22 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Follow-up: All deleted images were marked: and I sincerely believed that only a biased eye would not recognize that they belong from where they were deleted! Have a wonderful day! --Murus (talk) 04:44, 22 July 2013 (UTC)